December 2003, Volume 25, No. 12
Update Articles

Obesity - dietary management update

A W C Tang 鄧蕙菁

HK Pract 2003;25:616-622

Summary

Dietary modification in weight reduction management is of vital importance. Whilst intensive promotion in the media of fad diets for weight loss is escalating, individuals fail to achieve long-term weight maintenance following the initial weight reduction. Conventional dietary management in conjunction with physical activity remains the best option for the individual who wants to achieve weight loss and maintenance, thus reducing risks of obesity-related co-morbidities.

摘要

減肥過程中,飲食調節至關重要。傳媒極力推廣的纖體餐,初期可以快速減重,但卻不能達到長期的效果。傳統飲食控制配合適當運動,仍然是減肥和保持適當體重的最佳方法,從而可以減低肥胖相關疾病的風險。


Introduction

Obesity has become a global epidemic. New observations have concluded that in the past, most studies examining the effects of obesity on health were based on data from Europe or the United States.

The World Health Organization (WHO) report on obesity, prepared by the International Obesity Task Force, classifies obesity using the Body Mass Index (Table 1).1

BMI =

weight (kg)

Height2 (m2) (measured in indoor clothing and without shoes)

People from the Asia-Pacific region are facing increasing health risks associated with obesity at lower Body Mass Index (BMI). In a study of Hong Kong Chinese, the risk of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and albuminuria starts to rise at a BMI of about 23,2 which is lower than the cut-off point currently recommended by WHO to define an increase in morbidity among Europids. Similar data from the Chinese in Singapore have been published.3

Based on risk factors and morbidities, WHO (Western Pacific Region) proposes different BMI ranges for the Asia-Pacific region (Table 1).4

Table 1: Classification of weight by BMI in adult Europids1 and proposed classification of weight by BMI in adult Asians4

Classification BMI
(Europids)
BMI
(Asian)
Risk of
co-morbidities
Underweight < 18.5 < 18.5 Low (but increased risk of other clinical problems)
Normal range 18.5-24.9 18.5-22.9 Average
Overweight: 25 23  
At risk 25-29.9 23-24.9 Increased
Obese I 30-34.9 25-29.9 Moderate
Obese II 35-39.9 30 Severe
Obese III 40 - Very severe

Body fat distribution - waist circumference

Fat distribution is just as important as body weight when determining the risks associated with obesity. The simple clinical measure is waist circumference (for visceral fat mass). Using waist circumference as an alternative classification system will provide a more sensitive measure of long-term health risks.5 One Dutch study found that men and women with measurements >102cm and >88cm respectively were associated with a substantially increased risk of metabolic complications.6 A recent WHO report suggested appropriate measurements in Europids to be <94cm for men and <80cm for women.1 However, values of <90cm for men and <80cm for women have been proposed as more suitable for the Asian populations. Reduction in waist circumference even with no weight change may result in significant reduction in obesity-related co-morbidities risk such as type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, hypertension and dyslipidaemia.4 Current recommendation is as follows (Table 2):

Table 2: Waist circumference cut-off points1,4

  Increased risk
(Asians)
Increased risk
(Europids)
Substantially
increased risk
Men 90cm
(= 35 inches)
94cm
(= 37 inches)
102cm
(= 40 inches)
Women 80cm
(= 32 inches)
80cm
(= 32 inches)
88cm
(= 35 inches)

Waist-hip Ratio (WHR) is also used as a measure of abdominal obesity. In Caucasians, WHR >1.0 for men, and WHR >0.85 for women are indications of abdominal fat accumulation.7 However, waist circumference is still the preferred measurement of abdominal obesity over waist - hip ratio.1

Conventional dietary management

Epidemiological studies showed that, within populations, those consuming diets with the highest proportion of fat and lowest proportion of carbohydrate are the most likely to become obese.8

A weight reducing diet prescription should take into account the following:

Must provide a sustainable reduction in energy intake below energy requirements.
   
A deficit of 500-1000 kcal per day below predicted energy requirements will lead to a weight loss of approximately 0.5-1.0 kg/week:
   
 
500 kcal/day x 7 days week = 3500 kcal/week deficit

(equivalent of 0.5 kg of body weight)
 
1000 kcal/day x 7days week = 7000 kcal/week deficit

(equivalent of 1.0 kg of body weight)
   
Should provide full nutritional requirements necessary for good health especially in terms of micronutrients.
   
Should be sufficiently flexible to accommodate client's taste, financial status and religious restrictions as well as other aspects of their lifestyle.

Specific dietary considerations

Balanced diet

Distribution of food intake should be as even as possible throughout the day, and meals should not be "skipped" as a weight control method. Although there is no direct association between eating frequency and the risk of obesity, a structured eating plan helps the individual to shop wisely and reduce the risk of unplanned eating episodes. The Food Guide Pyramid principle (Figure 1) provides healthy eating guidelines. The recommended nutrient distribution for weight reduction is as follows (Table 3):

Figure 1: Diagram of food guide pyramid9

Table 3: Recommended nutrient distribution for weight reduction10,11

Nutrients   Recommended intake
Energy (kcal)   500-1000kcal/day less than usual intake
  Carbohydrate   55% of total daily energy intake
  Protein   ~15 % of total daily energy intake
  Fat   30% of total daily energy intake
  Saturates   8-10% of total daily energy intake
Cholesterol   <300mg/day
Fibre   ~18-30g/day

Dietary fat

Being the most energy-dense macronutrient, fat provides 9 kcal/g comparing to only 4 kcal/g for carbohydrate and protein. Hidden fat such as added oils, gravy/sauces should be taken into account. Fatty foods such as instant noodles, chips, chicken wings/feet, sausages, fish head and bone soup must be limited. A common misconception is canola oil is "less fattening" (i.e. has fewer calories) than peanut oil. The following (Table 4) shows the fat contents of fast foods from the same outlet:

Dietary carbohydrate

Starchy carbohydrates are still perceived as "fattening food" by many people especially for those who are trying to lose weight. This misconception must be clarified since carbohydrates actually have a low energy density comparing to fats. High carbohydrate foods such as rice, noodles, pasta, bread, cereals and potatoes provide the bulk of each meal as they help to increase our sense of satiety. They should account for 55-60% of total energy. Exchange systems are usually devised to ease compliance (Table 5). Fibre-rich sources such as red rice/wild rice, wholemeal pasta, bread and cereals also help to reduce risk of constipation when adequate fluid is also taken.

Dietary protein

Protein intake should not exceed 15% of total energy but long-term deficiency of protein can result in muscle wasting including that of the heart, increased susceptibility to infection and fatty infiltration of the liver. High protein foods include meat, fish, eggs, tofu, milk, cheese and pulses. Excessive meat intake is also associated with higher fat consumption. For a 1500 kcal diet, meat portions may be approximately 5-6 taels per day (Table 6).

Fruits and vegetables

Fruits and vegetables are good source of dietary fibre (non-starch polysaccharides), micronutrients and phytochemicals, which have a protective role on health. They together form a vital part in a balanced, reducing diet.

Most vegetables (generally low energy density), especially leafy greens, provide bulk to a meal, thus promoting feelings of satiety. Intake of vegetables should be aimed at a minimum of 6 tael per day. Coconut and avocado have higher fat contents and should be limited. Daily intake of 2 portions of fruit is acceptable. Fruits tend to have a high sugar content. Misconception regarding the need to avoid banana should be clarified. The important concept is to prevent excessive/inadequate intake (Table 7).

Alcohol

The UK Government's Inter-Departmental Working Group on Sensible Drinking formulated benchmarks for the general population on alcohol drinking: maximum daily intake should not exceed 3-4 units for men and 2-3 units for women (Table 8).13 Since alcohol provides 7 kcal/g, it should be abstained from or further cut down for those who want to lose weight.

Sugar-rich foods

Cutting down on sugary foods and drinks will certainly help to control body weight, e.g.


By cutting out one can of Cola/day (equivalent to 7 teaspoons of sugar)....

 
In 1 year, save 2,555 teaspoons of sugar
which is equivalent to 51,100kcal Body weight loss of 7.3kg

However, one can of soft drink or one piece of cake will not cause uncontrollable weight gain. Excessive dietary restrictions run the risk of creating compensatory cravings for these foods. Whilst total abstinence may sometimes be the best tactic in those for whom certain foods trigger excessive consumption, for most individuals it is important to learn how to control their intake of such foods in a rational manner.

Fluid intake

A daily intake of at least 2 litre of fluid (ideally plain water) is recommended. Drinking water before and after meals can also promote sense of fullness and will in turn help to reduce energy density of the meal. Common misconception: Chinese tea will help to lower fat absorption.

Snacks

Snacks may not be required by everyone. For some people, it may be genuine hunger; for others, taking snacks may be due to sheer boredom. For many people, it is probably best to include light snack between lunch and dinner in order to limit the chance of excessive hunger at dinner. Knowledge for appropriate food choices is important: for instance, a plain bun rather than a piece of cake; a glass of skimmed milk rather than a glass of sweetened lemon tea. The following (Table 9) shows that a fast-food meal can easily provide more than half of one day's energy need:

Table 9: Fast food facts12

Deep-fried Chicken Fillet Sandwich (1) 415 kcal
French Fries (Medium) 312 kcal
Regular Cola (360ml) 150 kcal
Total 877 kcal

Sugar and fat substitutes

Non-nutritive (intense) sweeteners e.g. Aspartame, Acesulfame Potassium, may be used. Although some do have energy value, their caloric contribution to food is negligible because they are used in such small quantities. On the other hand, fat-replacement foods such as "Olestra" are not generally available in the Asia Pacific region and have limited role.4

PracticalityPracticality

Lack of practical skills (rather than lack of knowledge) is often the hindrance for following dietary regimens. Education for shopping, cooking, dining-out, food portions and exchanges are vital. Discussion on coping with social situations, how to decline food, etc is also useful.

With intensive promotion in the media, the popularity of new and often bizarre approaches to weight reduction is escalating. The proposed diets which promise fast results with the minimum of effort often lead to low intake of macro- and micro-nutrients and the perpetuation of unscientific practices and substantial monetary loss. The potential health risks are seldom realised since fortunately these diets are usually abandoned after a few weeks.

Variations of low carbohydrates, high protein/fat diets have been popular for many years. Protein and fat intakes were unlimited whilst carbohydrate intake was severely restricted. This could easily have led to excessive intake of fat (including saturates and cholesterol) when protein was obtained from animal sources. In addition, the initial rapid weight loss from diuresis was secondary to the carbohydrate restriction.

Alternative weight loss products

Caffeine

Caffeine is a central nervous system stimulant that increases heart rate, blood pressure, and muscle stimulation. It has been used in many diet products to speed up metabolic processes. It can promote the burning up of fat as fuel during exercises. However, it has not been shown to lead to weight loss specifically. On the other hand, caffeine can cause dehydration, irritability, insomnia, headache and irregular heart beat.

Chitosan

Chitosan, as an ingredient in many weight-reducing commercial products, claims to inhibit dietary fat absorption by binding to lipids. Chitin is an indigestible fibre derived from the exoskeletons of shellfish. However, a recent study on humans reported no significant effects of chitosan on fat absorption; but chitosan may block the absorption of crucial fat-soluble vitamins such as the antioxidant vitamin E and increase calcium excretion.14,15 Study has shown that, chitosan in the administered dosage, without making changes to the diet, does not reduce body weight in overweight subjects.14

Very low calorie diets

Very Low Calorie Diets (VLCDs) commonly supply about 400-800kcal per day. These are usually commercially produced nutritional preparations marketed for use as a total food substitute.

They are intended for use only with obese clients (BMI 30) and are contraindicated in pregnancy and lactation as well as in clients with renal or hepatic disease, active cardiac dysfunction, insulin-dependent diabetes, cerebrovascular accidents, cancer, cholecystitis, alcoholism, and psychiatric disturbances.16,17

Although VLCDs promote rapid weight reduction and may benefit certain individuals, such diets have health risks and should be undertaken only under medical supervision.

This diet should be limited to 12-16 weeks duration to reduce the risk of adverse complications related to body protein losses, in particular cardiac problems. On completion of the VLCD programme, a gradual refeeding period of 2 to 4 weeks should follow.

VLCDs appear to be safe and effective in promoting short-term weight loss and improvements in obesity-related co-morbidities. Perhaps the most serious issue against the use of VLCDs is the inability of the subjects to maintain their weight loss when regular food is reintroduced.18 For long-term maintenance of weight loss, they are considered to be no better than other methods of weight reduction.19 Wadden and Richman showed similar findings when administering standard energy-restricted diets in comparison with VLCDs.20,21

Certain hospitals in Hong Kong use a modification of this approach based on 3-4 drinks of the preparation (~400-550 Kcal) daily for 2 weeks; additional vitamin and mineral supplements are prescribed as required. Nutrition counselling by a registered dietitian is important during and after treatment to establish sound and long-lasting healthy eating habits and weight control.

Physical activity

Physical activity is a vital component of weight reduction therapy when used in conjunction with an energy-controlled diet plan. Increasing activity is most helpful in weight maintenance. Frequency, duration, and intensity of exercise can be gradually increased as tolerated by the obese individuals. Walking is almost always the most appropriate form of physical activity. An initial goal may be to walk 30 minutes/day for 3 days a week, building up to 45 minutes/day of more intense walking for at least 5 days/week. In addition, the "everyday" level of activity should be increased, such as taking the stairs instead of the elevator and walking short distances instead of driving or taking public transport. Even doing some household tasks instead of watching television can contribute to further increase in energy expenditure.

Weight maintenance

Studies conducted 2-3 years after treatment with VLCD and behavioural modification showed that those who exercised the most kept the most weight off.22,23 Losses of 5-10% of body weight are usually associated with significant improvements in health.24 Dietitian's continuing support during this phase is vital.25

Weight cycling

The term "weight cycling" or "yo-yo dieting" refers to obese people who lose and then gain weight several to many times over their lifespan. Observations from the Framingham Study by Lissner have shown strong associations between weight variability and negative health outcomes.26 Both mortality and morbidity from coronary heart disease were increased in individuals with wider weight fluctuations. Using the data from the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT), Blair also linked increased weight variability to the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality.27 However, other studies have not shown the same results.28,29

Conclusion

Conventional dietary management in conjunction with physical activity remains the best option for the individual to achieve weight loss and maintenance. Decrease in dietary fat and increase in fruit and vegetable and fibre consumption will help to reduce the risk of obesity and minimise the potential for the development of co-morbidities. The importance of physical activity should not be underestimated as it has been shown to be a key component in the prevention of weight gain.

Key messages

  1. A weight reducing diet prescription:
    • Must provide a sustainable reduction in energy intake below energy requirements.
    • Should provide full nutrients necessary for good health especially in terms of micronutrients.
    • Should be sufficiently flexible to accommodate individual needs.

  2. Distribution of food intake should be as even as possible throughout the day. The Food Guide Pyramid principles should be followed and food varieties should be taken into consideration.
  3. Recommended nutrient distribution for weight reduction: of the total daily energy intake, carbohydrate should account for about 55%, 15% of protein and 30% of fat.
  4. Intake of 18-30g dietary fibre daily will help to provide bulk to a meal, thus promoting feelings of fullness and satiety as well as reducing the risk of constipation when adequate fluid intake has been taken.
  5. Physical Activity is a vital component of weight reduction therapy when used in conjunction with an energy-controlled diet plan. Increasing activity is most helpful in weight maintenance.


A W C Tang, BSc(Hons), SRD(UK)
Registered Dietitian,
Dietetic Department, United Christian Hospital.

Correspondence to : Ms A W C Tang, Dietetic Department, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.


References
  1. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva: WHO, 1998.
  2. Ko GTC, Chan JCN, Cockram CS, et al. Prediction of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia or albuminuria using simple anthropometric indexes in Hong Kong Chinese. Int J Obes 1997;21(suppl 1):S30-S36.
  3. Deurenberg-Yap M, Yian TB, Kai CS, et al. Manifestation of cardiovascular risk factors at low levels of body mass index and waist-to hip ratio in Singaporean Chinese. Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr 1999;8:177-183.
  4. World Health Organization (Western Pacific Region), IASO International Association for the Study of Obesity, International Obesity Task Force. The Asia-Pacific perspective: Redefining Obesity and its Treatment. Australia. WHO, 2000.
  5. Lean MJ, Han TS, Morrison CE. Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. BMJ 1995;311:158-161.
  6. Hans TS, van Leer EM, Seidell JC, et al. Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: prevalence study in a random sample. Br Med J 1995;311:1401-1405.
  7. James WPT. The epidemiology of obesity. In: Chadwick DL, Cardew GC, (eds). The origins and consequences of obesity. Chichester, Wiley, 1996: 1-16 (Ciba Foundation Symposium 201).
  8. Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M. Dietary composition and fat to sugar ratios in relation to obesity. Int J Obes 1994;18:820-828.
  9. Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S. Krause's Food, Nutrition, and Diet Therapy. 1996 (9th ed). Saunders: Philadelphia, USA.
  10. American Dietetic Association. Manual of Clinical Dietetics. 2000 (6th ed). ADA: Chicago.
  11. Thomas B. The British Dietetic Association (Editors) Manual of Dietetic Practice. 2001 (3rd ed). Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK.
  12. Franz MJ. Fast Food Facts. 1994 (4th ed). Chronimed: Minnesota, USA.
  13. Department of Health. Sensible Drinking. Report of an Inter-Departmental Working Group. London: DH, 1995.
  14. Pittler MH, Abbott NC, Harkness EF, et al. Randomised, double-blind trial of chitosan for body weight reduction. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999;53:379.
  15. Koide SS. Chitin-chitosan: properties, benefits, and risks. Nutr Res 1998;18:1091-1101.
  16. Pi-Sunyer FX. The role of very-low-calorie diets in obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;56(suppl 1):S240-243.
  17. Wadden T, Van Itallie T, Blackburn G. Responsible and irresponsible use of very-low calorie diets in the treatment of obesity. JAMA 1990;263:83-85.
  18. Wadden TA, Frey DL. A multicenter evaluation of a proprietary weight loss program for the treatment of marked obesity: a five-year follow-up. Int J Eating Dis 1997;22:203-212.
  19. National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity, National Institutes of Health. Very low-calorie diets. JAMA 1993;270:967-974.
  20. Wadden TA, Foster GD, Letzia KA. One-year behavioural treatment of obesity: comparison of moderate and severe caloric restriction and the effects of weight maintenance therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994;62:165-171.
  21. Richman R, Steinbeck KS, Caterson ID. Severe obesity: the use of very low energy diets or standard kilojoule restriction diets. Med J Aust 1992;156:768-770.
  22. Hartman W, Stround M, Sweet D, et al. Long term maintenance of weight loss following supplemented fasting. Int J Eating Dis 1993;14:87-93.
  23. Klem ML, Wing RR, McGuire MT, et al. A descriptive study of individuals successful at long-term maintenance of substantial weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;66:239-246.
  24. Jung R. Obesity as a disease. Br Med Bull 1997;53:264-285.
  25. Brownell KD, Fairburn ED (Editors). Eating disorders and obesity - A comprehensive handbook. 1995. Guildford Press: New York, USA.
  26. Lissner L, Odell PM, D'Agostino RB, et al. Variability of body weight and health outcomes in the Framingham population. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1839-1844.
  27. Blair SN, Shaten J, Brownell KD, et al. Body weight fluctuation, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Ann Int Med 1993;119:749-757.
  28. Wing R. Weight cycling in humans: A review of the literature. Ann Behav Med 1992;14:113-119.
  29. Jeffery R, Wing R, French S. Weight cycling and cardiovascular risk factors in obese and women. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55:641-644.

Bibliography
  1. American Dietetic Association. Manual of Clinical Dietetics. 2000 (6th ed). ADA: Chicago.
  2. Brownell KD, Fairburn ED (Editors). Eating Disorders and Obesity - A comprehensive handbook. 1995. Guildford Press: New York, USA.
  3. Garrow JS, James WPT (Editors) Human Nutrition and Dietetics.1993 (9th ed). Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, UK.
  4. Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S. Krause's Food, Nutrition, and Diet Therapy. 1996 (9th ed). Saunders: Philadelphia, USA.
  5. Thomas B. The British Dietetic Association (Editors) Manual of Dietetic Practice. 2001 (3rd ed). Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK.