Summary
Objective: To examine the awareness,
knowledge, attitude, risk perception and practices of Hong Kong residents
on dengue fever prevention.
Design: A cross-sectional telephone survey.
Subjects: Hong Kong residents aged 12 years
or above.
Main outcome measures: Awareness of health
education on dengue fever; knowledge, attitude, and risk perception
of dengue fever; practices for dengue fever prevention.
Results: 3,163 respondents completed the
interviews from 1 to 30 December 2003. The response rate was 71.2%.
97.0% of the respondents were aware of health education on dengue fever
prevention. 95.8% identified that dengue fever was transmitted via a
mosquito bite and 85.8% recognised high fever as a symptom. 84.4% and
64.0% regarded preventing mosquito breeding and mosquito bites as effective
preventive measures. The respondents perceived higher risk of contracting
dengue fever outside Hong Kong. Most respondents took some preventive
measures against dengue fever. Those who were male, single, working,
having higher household income, have a fair knowledge of dengue fever
and perceiving low risk of catching dengue fever were less likely to
take preventive measures.
Conclusion: The general public's knowledge,
attitude and practices for dengue fever prevention were improved compared
to previous findings in 2002.
Keywords: Dengue fever, knowledge,
attitude, practices, prevention
摘要
目的:探討港人對預防登革熱的意識、理解、態度、危機感和實踐。
設計:橫面電話訪問調查。
對象:十二歲或以上的香港居民。
測量內容:對登革熱健康教育的認知;對登革熱的理解、看 法及危機感;預防登革熱的實踐。
結果:於二零零三年十二月一日至三十日間,共有3,163位被訪者完成訪問,回應率為71.2%。97.0%的被訪者曾留意有關預防登革熱的資訊,95.8%的被訪者能指出登革熱是經由蚊叮傳播及85.8%知道高燒是登革熱的病徵,分別有84.4%及64.0%的被訪者相信防止蚊子滋生和避免蚊子叮咬是有效的預防措施。被訪者認為在境外的地方感染登革熱的風險較高。多數被訪者曾採取一些預防登革熱的措施。男性、單身、在職、家庭收入較高、對登革熱有不錯的認識及認為感染機會低的被訪者都較少採取預防措施。
結論:與二零零二年的調查結果比較,公眾對預防登革熱的認識、態度和實踐都有改善。主要詞彙:登革熱,認識,態度,實踐,預防
Introduction
Dengue fever is an acute viral disease transmitted by
the mosquito Aedes egypti and less efficiently by Aedes albopictus. It is endemic in many tropical and subtropical countries. Hong Kong discovered
its first local case of dengue fever in September 2002.1 Up
to August 2005, there were 21 local cases reported in Hong Kong.2
In October 2002, a territory wide against dengue fever
campaign was launched. The campaign consisted of three different components:
early detection and treatment of patients, public education for the community,
and eliminating mosquito breeding sites from the environment.
A survey was then carried out by the Department of Health (DH) to evaluate
the effectiveness of the campaign in December 2002.3 The findings
reflected that the campaign was successful. However, it was recommended
that all government departments had to work together to strengthen anti-mosquito
measures and related health education. In response to this, the Government
of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region brought various government
departments, non-governmental organisations, academic institutions and
the community together to combat the outbreak of dengue fever. Important
public health measures for disease control and prevention including surveillance,
border control, risk communication, public education and community prevention
have been implemented. The DH has been disseminating information, health
advice and guidelines on dengue fever to the community.
Although there are some case reports and surveillance
studies on dengue fever conducted in Hong Kong,4-6 there has
been no local research in dengue fever prevention. The 2002 Survey remains
the only available study in this area. To update the situation, the DH
conducted a similar study in December 2003 to examine the awareness, knowledge,
attitude, risk perception and practices of Hong Kong residents in response
to prevention of dengue fever.
Methods
The target population was Hong Kong residents aged 12
years or above. A telephone survey using a structured, bilingual (Chinese
and English) questionnaire was conducted from 1 to 30 December 2003. Random
telephone numbers were generated from residential telephone database.
Respondents were then selected by a modified "Last Birthday" method. From
each contacted household, a person aged 12 years or above who had his/her
birthday most recently and was at home at the time of interview was selected
to be the eligible respondent. This minimised over-representation of housewives
and the elderly in the sample.
Computer aided telephone interview (CATI) system was
employed to carry out interviews between 4:00pm and 10:00pm on weekdays
and weekends, to avoid over-representation of non-working people.
Interviews were conducted in Cantonese, English or Putonghua
by trained interviewers using standardized protocols. Each interview took
about 20 minutes. No contact, refusal and drop-out cases received repeated
calls (a maximum of five call attempts were made).
The questionnaire was designed by medical and research
professionals. The questionnaire addressed the following areas: public
awareness of health education on dengue fever prevention; knowledge about
and attitude towards dengue fever and its prevention; risk perception
of contracting dengue fever; practices of preventive measures against
dengue fever and related barriers to prevention; together with demographic
information concerning the respondents.
A four-point scale was adopted for the questions on
risk perception, (i.e., very likely, likely, unlikely and very unlikely).
An initial survey of 61 respondents was done as a pilot test to test the
questionnaire and determine the logistics for the survey. The comments
from the respondents and interviewers of the initial survey were considered
and the questionnaire was revised accordingly.
Among the 4,444 contacted households with eligible respondents
answering the call, 3,163 respondents successfully completed their interview.
The numbers of drop-out and refusal cases were 285 and 996 respectively.
The response rate was thus 71.2% (3,163/4,444).
Descriptive statistics were represented as percentages.
Associations between practices and different variables, including demographic
characteristics, knowledge, attitude and risk perception, were analysed
using chi-square test. Multiple logistic regression models with backward
stepwise selection were used to identify determinants of preventive practices
by adjusting confounders and estimating odds ratios (OR). Statistical
significance was presumed for probability p<0.05. Data analysis was performed
using SPSS for Windows version 11.0.1.
Results
Profile of the respondents
A total of 3,163 Hong Kong residents participated in
the survey. Among these, 43.7% were male and 56.3% were female; 50.2%
were single and 49.7% were married; 34.3% were aged 12-24, 39.3% aged
25-44 and 26.2% aged above 44 years; 12.9% attained primary education
level or below, 63.8% secondary school level and 23.3% tertiary level
or above; 27.2% were students, 44.1% were working and 28.7% were non-working.
The respondents' demographic profile is shown in Table
1.
Table
1: Demographic profile of the respondents |
Characteristic |
|
n* |
|
% |
|
|
|
Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
|
1,381 |
|
43.7 |
|
Female |
|
1,782 |
|
56.3 |
Age group (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 - 14 |
|
282 |
|
9.0 |
|
15 - 24 |
|
791 |
|
25.3 |
|
25 - 34 |
|
538 |
|
17.2 |
|
35 - 44 |
|
690 |
|
22.1 |
|
45 - 54 |
|
475 |
|
15.2 |
|
55 - 64 |
|
198 |
|
6.3 |
|
> 65 |
|
147 |
|
4.7 |
Marital status
|
|
|
|
|
|
Married |
|
1,558 |
|
49.7 |
|
Never married |
|
1,473 |
|
47.0 |
|
Widowed/ divorced/ separated |
|
101 |
|
3.2 |
Educational level
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary or below |
|
405 |
|
12.9 |
|
Secondary |
|
2,004 |
|
63.8 |
|
Tertiary or above |
|
733 |
|
23.3 |
Working status
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working |
|
1,368 |
|
44.1 |
|
Non-working |
|
892 |
|
28.7 |
|
Student |
|
845 |
|
27.2 |
Monthly household income (HK$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
< 9,999 |
|
390 |
|
18.6 |
|
10,000 - 19,999 |
|
622 |
|
29.7 |
|
20,000 - 29,999 |
|
434 |
|
20.7 |
|
30,000 - 39,999 |
|
267 |
|
12.7 |
|
> 40,000 |
|
383 |
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Total is not equal to 3,163
due to missing values |
|
Awareness of health education
Nearly all respondents (97.0%) were aware of the disseminated
information about dengue fever prevention in the three months prior to
the interview. Most obtained the information through television [advertisements/Government's
announcements (63.7%) and news (54.7%)] followed by newspapers (42.0%),
radio (17.7%), posters (11.5%), leaflets (9.9%) and websites (5.5%). Sixty
percent of the respondents were satisfied with the Government's efforts
in providing these information.
Knowledge of dengue fever
The majority of the respondents (95.8%) correctly identified
that dengue fever is transmitted via mosquito bites. Regarding the symptoms
of this disease, 85.8% of the respondents recognised high fever for three
to five days as a symptom, 44.2% recognised severe headache, 24.6% recognised
pain behind the eyes balls and 23.8% recognised skin rash. Many respondents
perceived preventing mosquito breeding (84.4%) and mosquito bite (64.0%)
as effective preventive measures. However, nearly half of the respondents
(49.5%) wrongly believed that there was an effective vaccine against dengue
fever. Over three-fifths (62.2%) of the respondents knew that in Hong
Kong there would be a fine for allowing mosquitoes or insects to breed
in stagnant water.
Attitude and risk perception towards dengue fever
Most respondents (90.2%) perceived that the consequences
of mosquito bites were serious and thus regarded preventive measures as
necessary. The perceived risk ("very likely" or "likely" in the questionnaire)
of catching dengue fever from outside Hong Kong (89.8%) was slightly higher
than that from within Hong Kong (84.5%). Nevertheless, 92.6% of the respondents
perceived the chance of surviving from the illness was high.
Practices of preventive measures
The proportions of the respondents who reported taking
various measures, as recommended by the Government, to prevent mosquito
breeding in the three months prior to the interview are shown in Figure
1. A high percentage of the respondents had practised putting
refuse such as empty lunch boxes and soft drink cans (which could collect
water) into covered litter bins (96.3%) and kept their drains free from
becoming blocked (85.4%). Over 60% had covered up tightly water containers,
water storage tanks or wells (67.0%), changed water in flower vase or
plants at least once a week (65.6%), and removed stagnant water under
flower or plant containers (60.7%). Nearly 40% had levelled up defective
ground surface to avoid accumulation of stagnant water (37.4%). The main
reasons cited by those respondents who had not taken preventive measures
were "unnecessary", "busy", "lazy", "forgotten" and "time-consuming".
Figure
1: Preventive practices against mosquito breeding |
|
Figure 2 shows the proportions of respondents who reported taking various measures
to prevent mosquito bites in the three months prior to the interview.
Around 60% of the respondents had worn long-sleeved clothes and trousers
(65.5%) or had avoided visiting scrubby areas (59.6%). More than two-fifths
had used mosquito repellents (42.6%) and nearly one-fifth installed mosquito
net in non-air-conditioned rooms (18.0%). The main reasons for not adopting
any preventive measure were described as "unnecessary" and "no mosquito".
Figure
2: Preventive practices against mosquito bite |
|
Factors associated with preventive practices
For each preventive practice against mosquito breeding,
the proportion of respondents who reported "measures were not taken" was
less than 8% (excluding "not applicable" and "don't remember"). Logistic
regression analysis therefore was not performed for this latter group.
For each preventive practice against mosquito bite, associations were
individually tested with demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitude
and risk perception, followed by use of logistic regression analysis.
Students were more likely than working respondents to
wear long-sleeved clothes and trousers (OR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.50-2.19). Respondents
who were male (OR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.46-0.63), single (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.91),
had a fair knowledge of dengue fever (OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.71-0.98) and
perceived a low risk of catching dengue fever in Hong Kong (Unlikely:
OR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82) were less likely than others to use mosquito
repellent. Single respondents (OR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.45-0.74) and those having
higher household income (HK$10,000-19,999: OR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.90
and HK$30,000-39,999: OR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.95) were less likely than
others to install mosquito net in non-air-conditioned rooms. Male respondents
(OR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.60-0.86) and those having higher household income
(HK$30,000-39,999: OR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.49-0.96 and HK$40,000 or above:
OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.46-0.86) were less likely than others to avoid visiting
scrubby areas.
Comparison with the 2002 Survey
The results of this survey were compared to the findings
of the 2002 Survey (Table 2).
The sample sizes and the distribution of demographic characteristics of
the respondents in both surveys are similar (3,163 respondents in this
survey versus 3,024 in the 2002 Survey). More people were aware of dengue
fever prevention measures (97.0% in this survey versus 61% in the 2002
Survey, p<0.001). Their knowledge regarding mosquito bite as the transmission
route for dengue fever also improved (95.8% versus 91%, p<0.001). The
percentages of respondents recognising high fever as a symptom increased
(85.8% versus 83%, p<0.005). More respondents correctly answered that
there was currently no effective vaccine against dengue fever (50.5% versus
43%, p<0.001), and that there would be a fine for allowing mosquito breeding
in stagnant water (62.2% versus 36%, p<0.001). Attitudes about dengue
fever also changed, with more people believing that mosquito bites could
lead to serious consequences and that preventive measures were needed
(90.2% versus 80%, p<0.001). With regard to preventive actions, more respondents
had placed refuse (which could collect water such as empty lunch boxes)
into covered litter bins (96.3% versus 87%, p<0.001), had covered up water
containers (67.0% versus 58%, p<0.001), had changed water for flower vase
at least once a week (65.6% versus 38%, p<0.001), and had removed stagnant
water under flower containers (60.7% versus 45%, p<0.001). In comparing
the findings of the two surveys, there were overall significant improvements
in public knowledge, attitude and behaviours in relation to the prevention
of dengue fever.
Table
2: Comparison between this survey and the 2002 Survey3 |
|
Statement |
This Survey
% |
2002 Survey
% |
p-value* |
1. |
Aware of information about dengue fever prevention
|
97.0 |
61 |
p<0.001 |
2. |
Know about mosquito bite as the transmission route
for dengue fever |
95.8 |
91 |
p<0.001 |
3. |
Know about high fever as a symptom for dengue fever
|
85.8 |
83 |
p<0.005 |
4. |
Know about no effective vaccine against dengue
fever currently |
50.5 |
43 |
p<0.001 |
5. |
Know about a fine for allowing mosquito breeding
in stagnant water |
62.2 |
36 |
p<0.001 |
6. |
Agree to the statement that "mosquito bites leading
to serious consequences and preventive measures being needed"
|
90.2 |
80 |
p<0.001 |
7. |
Put refuse (which could accumulate water such as
empty lunch boxes) in covered litter bins |
96.3 |
87 |
p<0.001 |
8. |
Cover water containers |
67.0 |
58 |
p<0.001 |
9. |
Change water for flowers at least once a week |
65.6 |
38 |
p<0.001 |
10. |
Remove stagnant water under flower containers |
60.7 |
45 |
p<0.001 |
|
|
|
|
|
* p-value is derived from two-sided
linear by linear Chi-square test. Statistical significance is
presumed for probability p<0.05. |
|
Discussion
This study's findings reflect improvements in the Hong
Kong people's knowledge, attitude and practices for dengue fever prevention.
Almost all respondents were aware of the disseminated information on dengue
fever, with three-fifths of the respondents being satisfied with the Government's
efforts in providing the information. However, the respondents might overestimate
their risk of catching dengue fever. Negative responses to some practices
for dengue fever prevention might mean that the preventive measures were
not appropriate to the respondents. For example, the respondents did not
wear long-sleeved clothes and trousers or use mosquito repellants because
they had not gone to rural area in the three months prior to the interview.
Respondents with high income might have better living environment in which
mosquito nets were not required. Factors related to preventive practices
against mosquito bite were gender, marital status, educational level,
occupation, household income, knowledge and risk perception. Females and
married persons were more likely to take preventive measures. The main
reasons for not adopting the preventive measures were "unnecessary", "busy"
and "lazy". All these factors have to be taken into consideration in future
educational and promotional activities.
The study has several limitations. Firstly, the demographic
composition of the sample is slightly different from that of the 2001
Population Census,7 with more respondents being female, single,
younger and more educated. The difference may be due to choosing the modified
Last-Birthday method __ i.e. not covering those who were seldom at home
and the non-respondents being the hard-to-reach population groups. Secondly,
the data were collected by self-report method which might have reporting
and recall bias. Thirdly, the study was cross-sectional in nature and
thus the causality between variables was uncertain.
Given the above findings, the against dengue fever campaign
conducted by the Government appeared successful in preventing Hong Kong
from becoming endemic with dengue fever. Since dengue fever is a statutory
notifiable disease in Hong Kong, surveillance has been strengthened through
issuing reminders to all doctors and health care professionals, and guidelines
on referring patients for timely treatment. The Government has put more
emphasis on promoting the preventive measures which had been inadequately
practised by the public. Publicity campaigns targeting the general public
include dissemination of health information on dengue fever by various
means such as television, radio, newspapers, printed materials, hotlines
and websites. Education interventions targeting specific groups include
mobilizing non-governmental organisations, schools and estate management
committees to organise health talks and exhibitions for their respective
groups. Moreover, the Government has strengthened its work in inspecting
buildings for environmental hygiene and removing potential mosquito breeding
sites. Oviposition traps have been set up to detect the presence and distribution
of adult Aedine mosquitoes across the territory. In addition, community
groups have been organised to clean up sites and to enhance community
participation in these efforts to reduce risk.
Conclusion
The effectiveness of the campaign was evident by the
changes in knowledge, attitude and, more importantly, behavioural changes
in the public. The results of the study have helped the Government to
assess the level of effectiveness of its work and to improve its health
promotion based on the needs of the public.
Acknowledgement
We thank the Social Sciences Research Centre of The
University of Hong Kong for collecting the data.
Key messages
- Health education can be effective in improving general public's knowledge,
attitude and practices for dengue fever prevention.
- Government's against dengue fever campaign was successful in preventing
an endemic in Hong Kong in 2002-2003.
Mei-lin Ho, MBBS(HK),
MRCP, DPFH, MPH
Senior Medical & Health Officer (Health Promotion)
Yee-kam Luk, BSocSc, MSc (Social Statistics),
MMedSc (Public Health)
Research Officer (Health Promotion)
Y L Choy, MPH, PhD
Head, Central Health Education Unit,
Central Health Education Unit, Department of Health.
Correspondence to:
Dr Mei-Lin Ho,
Central Health Education Unit, Department of Health, 7th Floor, Southorn
Centre, 130 Hennessy Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong.
References
- Auyeung TW, Que TL, Lam KS, et al. The first patient with
locally acquired dengue fever in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2003;9:127-129.
- Statistics on dengue fever: Centre for Health Protection, Department
of Health, 2005 November.
http://www.chp.gov.hk/notifiable1.asp?lang=en&id=43&pid=26&ppid=10 .
- Evaluation of anti-dengue fever campaign: Central Health Education
Unit, Department of Health, 2005 November.
http://www.cheu.gov.hk/eng/professional/index.htm.
- Pan HY, Chow JS. A case of hemorrhagic dengue without hypovolemia
in an adult. Trop Geogr Med 1984;36:305-307.
- Das P. Infectious disease surveillance update. Lancet Infect Dis
2002;2:133.
- Das P. Infectious disease surveillance update. Lancet Infect Dis
2002;2:203.
- Census and Statistics Department. 2001 Population Census: Main Tables.
Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department, Government of the Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region, 2002.