November 2007, Volume 29, No. 11
Editorial

White coat hypertension and white coat effect: its relevance to family physicians

Samuel Y S Wong 黃仰山

HK Pract 2007;29:409-410

"White coat hypertension" is an important clinical problem in general/family practice. It affects a considerable proportion of hypertensives1 despite variation in the prevalence of the condition. Although there is some controversy about this issue, most investigators have found that white coat hypertension diagnosed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is not associated with increased morbidity and thus usually does not require drug treatment.2,3

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home monitoring are two methods that are commonly used to diagnose "white coat hypertension" and evidence shows that both can improve the management of hypertension.4,5 In a literature review, Appel and Stason6 showed that end organ damage correlated much better with ambulatory blood pressure readings than with office readings and within the office, readings by physicians were higher than readings by nurse or technicians.

Research conducted to study the predictors of the white coat effect or white coat hypertension in general/family practice patients is important because ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can be costly and identification of predictors for white coat hypertension or white coat effect can help family physicians identify those who can obtain the most benefits from ABPM, making ABPM more cost effective7. Moreover, unnecessary side effects and costs can be reduced in those patients with only white coat hypertension.

Previous overseas studies7,8 demonstrated a number of predictors of white coat hypertension in primary care. These included blood pressure readings, gender, body mass index, smoking status and small left ventricular mass although the findings were not consistent.

In this issue of the Hong Kong Practitioner, Tam et al9, in a retrospective study, provided further evidence in the predictors of white coat hypertension in our Chinese primary care population. Although the study design was retrospective, it provided important information for predictors of white coat hypertension in patients with home monitoring of blood pressure.

Other important research in white coat hypertension, home monitoring or ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure included studies that look into the normal values for blood pressure taken at home and the more proper threshold for treatment of hypertension when the values of blood pressure from home monitoring is used. In the area of predictors of white coat hypertension, further prospective studies will provide family physicians with important practical information for identification of patient characteristics that can help in the identification of family practice patients that can most benefit from ABPM.


Samuel Y S Wong, MD, CCFPC, FRACGP
Assistant Professor,
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Correspondence to : Professor Samuel Y S Wong, Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong.


References
  1. Verdecchia P, Palatini P, Schillaci G, et al. Independent predictors of isolated clinic hypertension. J Hypertens 2001;19:1015-1020.
  2. Pikering TG. White coat hypertension: to treat or not to treat? Am Fam Physicain 1995;52:48,58.
  3. Fagard RH, Cornelissen VA. Incidence of cardiovascular events in white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension versus true normotension: a meta-analysis. J Hypertension 2007;25:2193-2198.
  4. Little P, Barnett J, Barnsley L, et al. Comparison of agreement between different measures of blood pressure in primary care and daytime ambulatory blood pressure. BMJ 2002;325:254.
  5. Staessen JA, Byttebier G, Butninx F, et al. Antihypertensive treatment based on conventional or ambulatory blood pressure measurement: a randomized controlled clinical trail. JAMA 1997;278:1065-1072.
  6. Appel LJ, Stason WB. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and blood pressure self management in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:867-882.
  7. Lindbaek M, Sandvik E, Liodden K, et al. Predictors of the white coat effect in general practice patients with suspected and treated hypertension. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53:790-793.
  8. Staessen JA, Den Hond E, Celis H, et al. Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician"s office: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:955-964.
  9. Tam F, Ng KK, Lau CM. What are the predictors of White-coat Hypertension in Chinese adults? HK Pract (in press)