What are the predictors of white-coat hypertension in Chinese adults?
Tammy K W Tam 譚嘉渭, Kwok-keung Ng 吳國強, Cheuk-man Lau 劉卓民
HK Pract 2007;29:411-418
Summary
Objective: To investigate the risk factors associated with white-coat
hypertension (WCH) in Chinese adults and to predict the possibility of WCH in patients
with elevated blood pressure in clinic but normal blood pressure at home in clinical
practice.
Design: Retrospective case series.
Subjects: From three primary care clinics. They had 24-hour ambulatory
blood pressure monitor (ABPM) performed from January 2001 to October 2006.
Main outcome measures: Percentage of subjects having WCH, relationship
between WCH and variables including age, gender, smoking, office systolic blood
pressure (SBP), office diastolic blood pressure (DBP), body mass index (BMI), diabetes,
anxiety, occupation, education level, and family history of cardiovascular diseases.
Results: The percentage of WCH in the study population was 28.2%.
The mean age of the 617 patients was 52.9+9.5 years, mean BMI 24.0+3.2 kg/m2, mean
office SBP 153.0+11.8 mmHg, and DBP 89.8+7.6 mmHg. Advanced age and lower BMI characterized
subjects with the development of WCH as opposed to those with sustained hypertension.
Conclusion: WCH is a common and important phenomenon. In selecting
patients for ABPM, use of home BP monitor, supplemented with identification of features
including advanced age and lower BMI would enable the practicing physicians to determine
more accurately which subjects were likely to benefit from ABPM.
Keywords: hypertension, white-coat; risk factors; Chinese; general
practice
摘要
目的: 研究中國籍成年人出現白大衣性高血壓white-coat hypertension (WCH) 的相關危險因素, 並預測病人在診所內有白大衣性高血壓,但當中血壓正常的機率。
設計: 回顧性研究。
研究對象: 2001年1月至2006年10月期間,3間基層診所,佩帶24小時流動血壓檢察儀器的病人。
主要測量內容: 診所發生白大衣性高血壓現象的百分比,以及這種現象,與其他變數.包括年齡、性別、吸煙、 診所內的收縮壓、診所內的舒張壓、體重指數、糖尿病、焦慮、職業、教育水平以及家族心血疾病史的關係。
結果: 被研究者發生白大衣性高血壓的百分比為28.2%。617名病人的平均年齡是52.9+9.5歲,平均體重指數為24.0+3.2
kg/m2,平均診所收縮壓153.0+11.8mmHg,平均舒張壓DBP 89.8+7.6mmHg。診所內引起高血壓現象的病人較持續有血壓高的病人更為年長及體重指數較低。
結論: 白大衣性高血壓是常見及重要現象。通過家中血壓觀察,觀察病人,是否年長或體重指數偏低,可以幫助醫生更準確地選擇哪些病人更適合流動血壓檢查。
主要詞彙: 高血壓,白大衣性高血壓,危險因素,中國籍,全科醫學。
Introduction
White-coat hypertension (WCH) refers to abnormally elevated blood pressures in the
medical environment and normal blood pressures during regular daily life.1-2
The phenomenon of WCH is common. In the analysis in the Progetto Ipertensione Umbria
Monitoraggio Ambulatoriale (PIUMA) database, prevalence of WCH was 33.3% in Joint
National Committee Stage I hypertension (systolic BP 140 to 159 mmHg or diastolic
BP 90 to 99 mmHg), 11.8% in Stage II (systolic BP 160 to 179 mmHg or diastolic BP
100 to 109 mmHg) and 3% in Stage III (systolic BP > 180 mmHg or diastolic BP > 110
mmHg).3
Regarding the risk of cardiovascular complications from WCH, the results from past
cohort studies to compare cardiovascular events among patients with WCH versus those
with sustained hypertension had been inconclusive. In general, WCH is regarded as
a point along the continuum of hypertensive disease and poses lower cardiovascular
risks than sustained hypertension. Therefore, long-term hypertensive treatment is
not justified unless the patient has sustained hypertension, evidence of cardiovascular
disease, or signs of target organ injury.4-5 However, these patients
should be regularly monitored because of an increased risk to develop sustained
hypertension, and they should be given intensive non-pharmacological treatment including
lifestyle modification, moderate salt restriction, weight reduction, regular exercise,
smoking cessation and correction of glucose and lipid abnormalities.6-8
Effective recognition of patients with WCH is important in clinical practice. The
condition is common and failure to recognize it will lead to over-treatment and
inappropriate use of medications and investigations, causing unnecessary side effects
to patients and excessive financial burden to the healthcare system. Several hypertension
guidelines even stipulate that all suspected WCH should have ABPM before implementing
antihypertensive therapy.9-11 In view of this, some overseas studies
have attempted to find out the clinical characteristics of subjects who are susceptible
to the development of WCH, so that more data are available for clinicians to estimate
the probability of WCH when evaluating patients with elevated office blood pressure,
particularly for those without home blood pressure measurements.2,3,12-14
These data have offered additional help to the practicing physician in determining
which subjects are more likely to benefit from ABPM. It is not certain whether similar
results can be applied for Chinese population, as there may be racial differences
for the factors involved, and similar studies for our locality have not been available.
With an ageing population and rising prevalence of essential hypertension in our
society, the implication of identifying WCH precisely and effectively in daily practice
is expected to be great. Furthermore, WCH is believed to be secondary to an apparent
stressor response during cuff measurement by a physician, even with multiple visits
to the same physician.15-17 Previous studies have not examined the effect
of anxiety and other social factors on WCH. This study sought to define the clinical
features of Chinese population that would predict the presence of WCH, and further,
to investigate the relationship between anxiety, occupation and educational level
and WCH.
Methods
Study design and selection criteria of subjects
This was a retrospective study conducted in three primary care clinics, and included
subjects with suspected WCH, based on abnormally elevated blood pressures in clinic
but normal blood pressures at home and had 24-hour ABPM performed, in the period
from January 2001 to October 2006. Exclusion criteria were subjects already receiving
anti-hypertensive treatment or those who had developed target organ damages such
as stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral vascular disease, hypertensive
retinopathy, electrocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy, raised
serum creatinine and proteinuria. Moreover, recruited subjects should not be taking
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, sympathomimetics, or liquorice at time
of monitoring; and they should not be having acute intercurrent illnesses, acute
stressful events or unstable psychiatric conditions.
Procedure
The ambulatory blood pressure monitor used in this study was model TM-2420. It was
validated by the British Hypertension Society and the US Association for the Advancement
of Medical Instrumentation. Before referring a patient for 24-hour ABPM, there should
be at least 3 abnormal blood pressure readings recorded in 3 separate clinic visits.
The referring doctor had to complete a standardized referral form for the subject
from which clinical information would be collected. These data included patient"s
age and gender, body mass index (BMI), mean office blood pressure over previous
three clinic visits, occupation, educational level, smoking history (ever or never
smoked), presence of diabetes mellitus (American Diabetic Association diagnostic
criteria), presence of anxiety or other psychological problems (indicated by presence
of International Classification of Primary Care, second edition [ICPC-2] diagnostic
codes of P01, P02, P04, P25, P27, P29, P74, P75, P76, P78, P79, P82, and P99 in
case record), and family history of cardiovascular diseases.
Subjects were diagnosed sustained hypertension if the 24-hour ABPM showed systolic
blood pressure > 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg, or WCH if systolic
blood pressure < 135 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure < 85 mmHg, or inconclusive
if the blood pressure readings were in-between these two defined levels. On the
day of ambulatory monitor, at least 14 blood pressure readings from the time interval
9:00 to 21:00 should be obtained before the results were regarded as valid and interpretable.
Otherwise, the same procedure would be repeated for patients with insufficient number
of clinical data. The final result was determined by one of the doctors in the "Central
panel of WCH" to ensure standardization of data interpretation.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
version 10.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago [IL], United States). Descriptive information for
each explanatory variable was derived. Bivariate association of each variable with
WCH was assessed by t-test for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical
variables. Multivariate logistic regression was applied for adjusting confounding
relationship between different variables. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
Results
We recruited 795 subjects for 24-hour ABPM in the study; 617 (77.6%) subjects successfully
completed the procedure and produced conclusive results. During the study period,
there was no report of major complication which had required premature termination
of the procedure.
We included 617 subjects with conclusive results for statistical analysis. Of this
sample population, 23 (3.7%) were required to repeat the procedure once or more
before conclusive results were obtained. The mean age of the subjects was 52.9+9.5
years, BMI 24.0+3.2 kg/m2, mean systolic blood pressure in office 153.0+11.8
mmHg, and mean diastolic blood pressure in office 89.8+7.6 mmHg. Majority (91.7%)
never smoked. Over 90% of them had achieved secondary education of above. Presence
of anxiety was noted in 13.3% of subjects. (Table
1)
The percentage of WCH in our study sample was 28.2%. In bivariate analysis, we found
that WCH was significantly associated with advanced age (p < 0.0001), female gender
(p = 0.01), lower BMI (p = 0.0006), lower mean diastolic blood pressure in office
(p < 0.0001), educational level (p = 0.02), of which university education was negatively
associated with WCH, and occupation (p = 0.02), of which more labour workers were
found to have WCH. Subjects who were non-smokers (p = 0.28) and anxious (p = 0.31)
were not significantly more likely to be diagnosed WCH. To adjust for confounding
variables, we applied multivariate logistic regression by selecting explanatory
variables with p < 0.05 in bivariate analysis to enter the model. The logistic regression
model showed that only advanced age and lower BMI were statistically associated
with WCH. However, the area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was 0.64
only.
Discussion
WCH is a common condition in the hypertensive populations and in the population
at large. The phenomenon of WCH may reflect an abnormally vigorous sympathetic response
to the environment of the blood pressure measurement, especially in the presence
of a nurse or physician.18-19 Depending on definitions, different studies
on Caucasians have variably reported that 21-58% of hypertensive patients without
target organ injuries have WCH.2,3,20 In the present study, we adopted
the definition laid down by the European Society of Hypertension and diagnosed the
condition of WCH when ambulatory blood pressure showed systolic BP < 135 mmHg and
diastolic BP < 85 mmHg during the daytime period.21 With this definition,
the percentage of WCH in our study population was 28.2%. In other words, as in Caucasians,
the phenomenon of WCH also represented a significant entity in the diagnosis of
hypertension in Chinese, because more than one fourth of the patients with elevated
blood pressure in clinic would be inappropriately treated for hypertension if the
possibility of WCH was overlooked by the case physician. Consequently, this would
lead to overuse of antihypertensive agents in a substantial number of patients and
render them to sustain unnecessary side effects of medications, not yet to mention
the financial cost added on our already-strained healthcare economic structure by
the unnecessary drug prescriptions.
Managing patients with episodic elevation of blood pressure in office is the bread
and butter in general practice. In facing the diagnostic challenge as posed by the
high prevalence of WCH, ABPM would play an essential role in establishing the diagnosis
of hypertension before implementation of anti-hypertensive therapy. The technique
is non-invasive, and the recording monitor reliable, accurate and convenient. They
typically take readings every 15 to 30 minutes throughout the day and night while
the patients go about their normal daily activities, and store the readings, which
can then be downloaded onto a personal computer for analysis. There is also literature
on its clinical utility and body of evidence showing ambulatory blood pressure levels
are more closely correlated with cardiovascular morbidity.22 In our 5-year
experience of performing 24-hour ABPM for patients with suspected WCH, general feedbacks
from patients were positive. Out of our study population, most of them (617/795
or 77.6%) had successfully completed the procedure with conclusive results, and
none of them had reported any major complications that had caused premature termination
of the procedure. We also observed that for subjects documented to have sustained
hypertension from ABPM, they were more willing to follow medical advice and comply
with the prescribed anti-hypertensive treatment.
In most practice settings where there is resource limitation, it is not possible
to admit all patients with elevated blood pressure in clinic to have ABPM to exclude
WCH. To enable a more sensitive case selection, overall data from overseas studies
indicate that the probability of WCH increases in subjects with lower office systolic
BP 140 to 159 mmHg or diastolic BP 90 to 99 mmHg, female gender, lower BMI, nonsmokers,
hypertension of recent onset, limited number of BP measurements in the office and
small left ventricular mass.2,3,12-14,23,24 In line with some of these
findings, our results also demonstrated that WCH was significantly associated with
lower BMI (p = 0.0006) and suggested that female patient was more likely to develop
WCH, though the relationship was not significant in logistic regression model. For
the relationship with office blood pressure, we found that lower office diastolic
BP was associated significantly with WCH in bivariate analysis, but this factor
was excluded in the logistic regression model after adjusting for confounding variables.
We might need to accumulate more clinical data in the near future to further establish
the relationship between WCH and office BP. In previous studies, the role of age
as an independent predictor of WCH is controversial.2,12 In our study,
advanced age was significantly associated with the development of WCH. The implication
of detecting WCH in elderly patients is great because they are usually more susceptible
to side effects and drug interactions of medications than younger subjects.
We were not aware of any previous research investigating the relationship between
WCH and anxiety, education level and job nature. The present study demonstrated
that subjects with anxiety were not more likely to develop WCH than those without.
However, the diagnosis of this condition was based only on the presence of certain
diagnostic codes in the case records, rather than on individual clinical assessment.
Further study with more valid and standardized measurement of anxiety might be necessary
to confirm its relationship with WCH. Nevertheless, persons prone to anxiety or
stress might be more susceptible to development of sustained hypertension instead
of WCH, as suggested by a study establishing that higher levels of self-reported
occupational stress are predictive of greater ambulatory blood pressure among British
doctors.25 For education level and occupation, we found that they were
significantly associated with WCH in bivariate analysis; their exclusion by the
logistic regression model might be related to the insufficient sample size due to
missing data. Interestingly, we observed subjects with university qualifications,
or working in disciplinary forces were more likely to be diagnosed sustained hypertension;
while those attaining only primary education or below, or working as labour workers
were more likely to have WCH. These findings might have reiterated the role of stress
in development of sustained hypertension.
Nonetheless, the discriminating power of our logistic regression model was not strong,
as judged by its low ROC of 0.64 only. We proposed that when evaluating Chinese
subjects with elevated BP in primary care setting, the presence of characteristics
such as advanced age and low BMI would increase the pretest probability of WCH but
were by no means able to replace the established indications for ABPM.26
The major limitation of this study was that we recruited only subjects with home
blood pressure readings available. In this regard, the actual prevalence of WCH
in our population might be different from what we had estimated in the study. Also,
patients with self blood pressure measurements might be more health conscious and
socially advantageous than those without, and this discrepancy might have given
rise to a different spectrum of clinical and social characteristics so derived.
However, according to our estimation in a previous study, about 70% of hypertensive
patients in our study setting did have home BP monitor.27 The results
of the current project might have already represented the majority of our patient
population. In actual fact, the reference from home BP readings had enabled us to
detect most, if not all, of our patients with WCH in the past. We would like to
suggest here the importance of home blood pressure monitor in uncovering the condition
of WCH in a heterogeneous group of patients presented with elevated blood pressure
in clinic environment.
Conclusion
WCH is a common and important condition to be recognized for both Chinese and Caucasians
who presented with elevated blood pressures in the medical environment. ABPM is
an effective and reliable tool for detecting the phenomenon of WCH. Under resource
limitations where ABPM could not be universally performed for patients with elevated
blood pressures in clinics, the use of home BP monitor, supplemented with identification
of features including advanced age and lower BMI would enable the practicing physicians
to determine which subjects were more likely to benefit from ABPM.
Acknowledgement
We would like to express our sincere thanks to Dr Tsang Chiu Yee, Luke for his support
on this study and establishment of ABPM in service. We also thank Dr Lau Kam Tong,
Dr Lau Man Wai, Dominic and Dr Lai Wing Yiu, Stephen for their contribution in data
entry in this project.
Key messages
- White-coat hypertension is a common and important condition.
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is the standard diagnostic tool for detecting
white-coat hypertension in clinical practice.
- Home blood pressure monitoring serves important role in guiding clinician to diagnose
white-coat hypertension.
- Patients with advanced age and low BMI were more likely to have white-coat hypertension.
Tammy K W Tam, MMedSc (HKU), FRACGP, FHKCFP, FHKAM (Fam Med)
Medical and Health Officer,
Kwok-keung Ng, MBChB (CUHK), FRACGP, FHKCFP, FHKAM (Fam Med)
Senior Medical and Health Officer,
Professional Development and Quality Assurance, Department of Health.
Cheuk-man Lau, MA (CityU)
Correspondence to : Dr Tammy K W Tam, Kowloon Families Clinic, 6/F Yaumatei
Polyclinic, 145 Battery Street, Yaumatei, Kowloon.
References
- CMS: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Coverage Policy - Decisions.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (#CAG-00067N). 2001. http://www.hcfa.gov/coverage/8b3-ff.htm.
- Pickering TG, James GD, Boddie C, et al. Laragh JH: How common is white-coat hypertension?
JAMA 1988;259:225-228.
- Mancia G, Bertineri G, Grassi G, et al. Effects of blood pressure measured by the
doctor on patient's blood pressure and heart rate. Lancet 1983;2:695-698.
- Verdecchia P. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure: current evidence and
clinical implications. Hypertension 2000;35:844-851.
- Ernst M, Bergus G. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: technology with purpose.
Am Fam Physician 2003;67:2262-2270.
- Julius S, Jamerson K, Meija A, et al. The association of borderline hypertension
with target organ damages and higher coronary risk, Tecumseh Blood Pressure Study.
JAMA 1990;264:354-358.
- Pearce KA, Grimm RH Jr, Rao S, et al. Population-derived comparisons of ambulatory
and office blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 1992;152:750-756.
- Chrysant SG. Treatment of white-coat hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep 2000 Aug;2(4):412-417.
- Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure:
The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on the detection, evaluation, and
treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2413-2446.
- Guidelines Subcommittee: 1999 WHO/ISH Guidelines for the management of hypertension.
J Hypertens 1999;17:151-183.
- Ramsay LE, Williams B, Johnston GD, et al. British Hypertension Society guidelines
for hypertension management 1999: Summary. BMJ 1999;519:630-635.
- Staessen JA, O'Brien ET, Atkins N, et al. on behalf of the Ad-Hoc Working Group:
Short report: Ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive compared with hypertensive
subjects. J Hypertens 1993;11:1289-1297.
- Verdecchia P, Palatini P, Schillaci G, et al. Independent indicators of isolated
clinic (white-coat) hypertension. J Hypertens 2001;19:1015-1020.
- Dolan E., Stanton A, Atkins N, et al. Determinants of white-coat hypertension. Blood
Pressure Monitoring 2004;9:307-309.
- Julius S, Mejia A, Jones K, et al. "White coat" versus "sustained" borderline hypertension
in Tecumseh, Michigan. Hypertension 1990;16;617-623.
- HOegholm A, Kristensen KS, Madsen NH, et al. White coat hypertension diagnosed by
24-h ambulatory monitoring. Examination of 159 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.
Am J Hypertens 1992;5:64-70.
- Alderman MH, Ooi WL, Madhavan S, et al. Blood pressure reactivity predicts myocardial
infarction among treated hypertensive patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:859-866.
- Middeke M, Lemmer B. Office hypertension: abnormal blood pressure regulation and
increased sympathetic activity compared with normotension. Blood Pressure Monitoring
1996;1:403-407.
- Mancia G, Parati G, Pomidossi G, et al. Alerting reaction and rise in blood pressure
during measurement by physician and nurse. Hypertension 1987;9:209-215.
- Julius S, Meija A, Jones K, et al. "White coat" versus "sustained" borderline hypertension
in Tecumseh, Michigan. Hypertension 1990;16:617-623.
- O"Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, et al. on behalf of the European Society of Hypertension
Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension recommendations
for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypetens 2003;21:821-848.
- Appel LJ, Stason WB. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and blood pressure self-measurement
in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Ann Int Med 1993;118:867-882.
- Verdecchia P, O"Brien E, Pickering T, et al. When can the practicing physician suspect
white coat hypertension? Statement from the working group on blood pressure monitoring
of the European Society of Hypertension. AJH 2003;16:87-91.
- Bjorklund K, Lind L, Vessby B, et al. Different metabolic predictors of white-coat
hypertension and sustained hypertension over a 20-year follow-up period: A population-based
study of elderly men. Circulation 2002;106:63-68.
- Daryl B O"Connor, Rory C O"Connor, Barbara L White, et al. Are occupational stress
levels predictive of ambulatory blood pressure in British GPs? An exploratory study.
Family Practice 2001;18:92-94.
- O"Brien E, Andrew Coats, Patrick Owens, et al. Use and interpretation of ambulatory
blood pressure monitoring: recommendations of the British Hypertension Society.
BMJ 2000;320:1128-1134.
- Tam KW, Fan YM, Lau KT, et al. Are we evidence-based in prescribing for hypertension?
APFMJ 2006;5:issue 3.
|