Family Physician with special interest - the way forward
Mary B L Kwong 鄺碧綠
HK Pract 2007;29:329-330
General practitioners or primary care physicians have done work more assigned to
secondary care since long time ago. It was not a new concept when the UK Government
initiated the appointment of general practitioners with special interests (GPwSI)
in year 2002. This has helped to relieve access to specialties that traditionally
have long waiting times for investigations and treatment.1 It is being
taken as the answer to the growing demand for specialist services which has shown
satisfactory result in the breast physician2, in public health3
and managing chronic respiratory disease.4 Similar happenings at the
primary-secondary care interface are taking place in Europe and Australia. How about
the situation in Hong Kong?
The health care system of Hong Kong is neither a National Health Service like in
the U.K. nor a central billing system as in Australia. It is unique in having a
public sector (Hospital Authority, Department of Health, the Universities) and a
private sector. In the public sector, there are hospital specialty specialists and
specialist family physicians. The primary care practitioners in private sector include
family medicine specialists, general practitioners, specialty specialists, practitioners
of TCM, chiropractor, etc. Let us concentrate on our specialty - the family physicians
with special interest (FPwSI).
FPwSI is the growing trend in the private sector with a range of positive benefits.
It is definitely an added value in fee-for-services market and might be considered
as cost effective to a certain extent. Primary care doctors providing services,
traditionally only obtained through secondary care, definitely help to decrease
the workload, hence the financial expenses, in the public sector. But in U.K., according
to the NHS report, the general practitioner with special interest service for dermatology
is more costly than hospital outpatient care.5 Their cost effectiveness
has been questioned but patients' views on the services were generally positive.6
Integration of primary care with certain amount of secondary care by the family
physician or general practitioner with special interest could satisfy the needs
of patients such as shortening the hospital specialty waiting time, alleviating
patients' worries and may address previously unmet needs. Hence, the additional
cost can be weighed against the health outcomes.7
Will the development of certain specialty roles compromise valued generalist skills?
Family medicine is already one specialty dealing with a wide range of patients,
from infancy to elderly of both sex, a wide range of problems from acute to chronic
diseases, from early undifferentiated to co-morbidities or terminal palliative care.
To be a competent caring family physician, we have to broaden our view, knowledge
and skills to deal with all problems in the primary care. Developing a special interest
could deskill our doctors and increase the workload by treating previously untreated
conditions. On the other hand, improving and widening our competence and skill could
be a way of professional development.
In 2005, the Board of Education of our College formed a Professional Development
Subcommittee. Since then, various Interest Groups are added yearly. Now we have
five "Interest Groups", namely Geriatric, Mental Health, Medico-legal Alert, Dermatology
and Musculoskeletal. Questions have been raised about their usefulness. Some query
whether it will develop into subspecialties for Family Physician with Special Interest.
Our Interest Groups are hoping to provide a platform for all our members in the
public and private sectors to meet together and to share experience. Our aims are
actually very simple:
- To maintain our interest in the care of our patients holistically, to upgrade our
standard, to raise our morale and increase job satisfaction.
- To provide peer support, to share some problem cases with specialists or expertise
for skill-mix and to bridge the professional gap.
- Our goal is to promote early awareness, clinical governance and risk management
in respect to different medical fields, to assure a better management and a high-quality
health care for the public.
Our Interest Groups are not equivalent to subspecialties of family medicine and
will not develop into subspecialties in the near future. At the 2007 Annual Scientific
Meeting of Hong Kong College of Family Physicians, Dr Natalie Yuen, our College
Censor stated: "many higher trainees are looking for further training in their areas
of special interest, like many general practitioners and family doctors in other
countries who are developing special skills in areas such as psychological medicine,
counselling skills, child-health in primary care, academic general/family practice,
musculo-skeletal medicine, and research. This is a trend many family doctors are
pursuing, and as a College we must take note of such trends in developing future
family practice."8 He spoke the hearts of many - Family Physician with
Special Interest is the way forward.
Mary B L Kwong, MBBS(HK), FRCP(Edin),FHKAM(Fam Med), FHKAM(Paed)
Family Physician in Private Practice
Correspondence to : Dr Mary B L Kwong, 18/F, Crason Commercial Centre, 333
Nathan Road, Kowloon.
References
- Helman CG. Culture, health and illness. 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
- Segall A. Cultural factors in sick role expectations. In: Gochman DS, editor. Health
Behaviou: emerging research perspectives. New York: Plenum Press; 1988.
- Shih FJ. Concepts related to Chinese patients' perceptions of health, illness and
person: issues of conceptual clarity. Accid Emerg Nurs 1996;4:208-215.
- Chen YC. Chinese values, health and nursing. J Adv Nurs 2001;36:270-273.
- Berger JT. Culture and ethnicity in clinical care. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:2085-2090.
- Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, et al. Cultural influences on the physician-patient
encounter: the case of shared treatment decision-making. Patient Education and Counselling
2006;63:262-267.
- Napoles-Springer AM, Santoyo J, Houston K, et al. Patients perceptions of cultural
factors affecting the quality of their medical encounters. Health Expect 2005:8:4-17.
- Lam TP. Stregths and weaknesses and traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine
in the eyes of some Hong Kong Chinese. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:762-765.
- Chan MF, Mok E, Wong YS, et al. Attitudes of Hong Kong Chinese to traditional Chinese
medicine and Western medicine: survey and cluster analysis. Complementary Therapies
in Medicine 2003;11:103-109.
- Wong TW, Wong SL, Donnan SP. Traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine in
Hong Kong: A comparison of the consultation processes and side effects. Hong Kong
Med J 1993;45:278-284.
- Wong TW, Wong SL, Donnan SP. Prevalence and determinants of the use of traditional
Chinese medicine in Hong Kong. Asia Pac J Public Health 1995; 8:167-170.
- The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Article 138. Online
document available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/basic_law/fulltext/ Accessed February
11, 2005.
- Chung V, Wong E, Woo J, et al. Use of traditional Chinese medicine in the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region of China. J Altern Complement Med 2007;13:361-367.
|