Pleasure from sex or the enjoyment of having sex is an essential part
in a person’s physical, mental, and spiritual well-being. It has been shown
that the desire for sexual enjoyment is preserved right into old age in men.1
Yet, the loss of sexual power is often considered by many people and even
by some health professionals as a natural ageing process; hence, many
sufferers are reluctant to discuss their problem with another person
including their own partner, friends or doctors.
Erec tile d ysfunc tion (ED) is a hig hly pr evalen t cond ition that
increases with age. A survey in Hong Kong showed that 62% of men aged
between 40-80 years old had experienced it.2 ED can result in having a
significant impact on one’s social and personal life, ranging from the loss
of confidence in oneself and his self-esteem to a major depression.3
The recent advance in oral treatment of ED has benefited many men
to restore their sexual function. However, a significant proportion of men
do not respond to oral treatment.4, 5 It has been shown that for men not
responding to oral ED treatment, the psychological and social impact on
them were even more pronounced as compared to those men not receiving
treatment.6 The psychological impact of ED knows no border. Studies
conducted in different parts of the world demonstrated similar effects on
affected men; for examples, the reduced self-esteem and confidence seen
among Spanish men7 and the lowered quality of life felt among the
Japanese.8
Despite there are effective treatments for ED and
demonstrated benefits in gaining self-esteem, confidence
and relationship satisfaction after treatment9, there are
many sufferers who are still reluctant to seek help and
medical assistance for their condition.10,11 Many younger
physicians, although they are aware and consider ED a
significant problem, lack the knowledge, skills and
mot iv at io n to in it ia te h elp fo r pa t ie n t s wi th thi s
condition.12,13 Baldwin et al14 cited some reasons for this
phenomenon. In their study, 74% of men failed to
d is cu ss the p ro b lem wi th their d o ctor b ec au se o f
embarrassment; 12% felt that ED was a natural part of
ageing; 10% did not consider the problem worthy of
attention. These results indicate that there is still a lack
of openness in discussing sexual issues among male
patients and with their doctor. This may be related to
the social values and the stigma attached to sexual
problems and talking about sex. Similar results were
also found in Japan where only 4.8% of male with ED
had consulted a physician.11 The main reasons cited by
these men included ED having no influence on their
daily life or they were not bothered by their ED, no sex
drive, feeling shy, unsure where to seek medical help
and perceiving a high cost of the treatment.
A cross-nation study studied the attitudes of men with
ED14 showed there were comparable attitudes held by men
in different counties which are summarized below:
- men in all countries agreed ED is a source of great
sadness for themselves and their partners;
- nearly all disagreed that they were too old for sex;
- men in all countries agreed that it was important to
know that they had the capacity to perform sexually;
- half of all men reported they would do “nearly
anything” to cure their ED; and,
- men in all countries agreed that their doctor was the
best source of information on sexual issues.
Further exploration by Metz and Seifert15 also showed
that men believed that physicians were the most preferred
professionals for consultations regarding their concerns on
sexual issues, and 82% of men preferred their doctors to
initiate the discussion.10 This latter passive attitude is good
both ways: in that it serves as a means for the patients to
off-load the responsibility to the health professionals, in
particular the family physicians who are judged among
patients to be the most appropriate person to help their
predicament and the doctors to take the lead.12
At the same time, there are many doctors, some even
family physicians, believe that ED is not a serious problem
– only psychological in nature and consider treatment for
ED is only for recreational function and enjoyment. A
study of some Chinese physicians revealed that they would
only deal with the problem if the patients had complained
about it and many would not consider diagnosing and
treating ED as their primary role.13 Similar findings were
shown in ano ther study from USA sug gesting that
physicians’ attitudes towards ED could be fairly universal
across different societies.16
The effects of ED often extend beyond an individual
and can affect the whole family which is well illustrated
in the case report by Fogelman and Bloch in this issue.
This report further demonstrated that the attitude of health
professionals could have great impact on the health-seeking
behaviour of patients and what differences could be made
when a doctor played an active role in the management
process. The article by Li and Ng also illustrated the
importance of having a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary
approach to ED. As the causes of ED are often multifactorial,
its management often goes beyond a prescription
of o ra l me di ca tion . Inv olveme nt o f othe r he al th
professionals such as nurses, psychologist, sex therapist and
marriage counsellor can provide much better outcomes.
Furthermore, there is strong evidence to suggest that
the importance of managing ED can also be a predicting
factor for coronary disease, especially in the diabetic
patients.17 This places further importance on family
physicians to screen for ED. The audit report by Chiu
provides a good reflection on our daily practice in
anticipatory care as prevention is one of the key roles of
family physicians.
Changes to the current situation of poor diagnosis and
management of ED require changes in both the attitudes and
belief system of both doctors and patients. Training courses
on ED management have been shown to be effective in
providing the necessary knowledge; enhancing doctors’
communication skills with ED patients; and, ensuring
patient-centred approach when dealing with ED patients.18
Se x u a l he a l th i s a mu c h n e g l e c t e d a r e a in b o th
undergraduate and postgraduate medical training. More
sexual health education should be available for health
professionals with an emphasis on a holistic approach
towards sex, not just on ED alone. It would be ideal to
envision the formation of an association of sexual health
care providers which makes up a group of interested interdisciplinary team members to conduct research and
provide training for younger family physicians in Hong
Kong.
Francois Fong, MFM (Clinical), MHSc (SexHlth), FRACGP
Medical Director,
Hong Kong Sexual Health Centre.
William C WWong, MD, MPH, FRACGP, FRCGP
Associate Professor & Director of General Practice & Primary Care Education,
University of Melbourne.
Adjunct Associate Professor, School of Public Health, The Chinese Unviersity of Hong Kong.
Correspondence to : Dr William CW Wong, Department of General Practice, 200 Berkeley Street, Carlton,
Vic 3053, Australia.
References
- Pfeiffer E, Verwoerdt A, Wang H. The natural history of sexual behaviour in
a biologically advantage groups of aged individual. J Gerontol 1969;24:193-
198.
- Hong Kong Urological Association Men’s Health Survey 2003.
- Shabsigh R, Klein LT, Seidman S, et al. Increased incidence of depressive
symptoms in men with erectile dysfunction. Urol 1998;52:848-852.
- Virag R. Indications and early results of sildenafil (Viagra) in erectile
dysfunction. Urol 1999;54:1073-1077.
- Mydlo JH, Volpe MA, Macchia RJ. Initial results utilizing combination therapy
for patients with a suboptimal response to either alprrostadil or sildenafil
monotherapy. Eur Urol 2000;38:30-34.
- Tomlinson JM, Wright D. Impact of erectile dysfunction and its subsequent
treatment with sildenafil: qualitative study. BMJ 2004 May 1;328(7447):1037.
Epub 2004 Mar 29.
- Martin-Morales A, Meijide Rico F, Garcia Gonzalez JI, et al. Psychological
impact of erectile dysfunction on self-esteem and self-confidence. Actas Urol
Esp 2005 May;29(5):493-498.
- Kushiro T, Takahashi A, Saito F, et al. Erectile dysfunction and its influence
on quality of life in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2005
Mar;18(3):427-430.
- O’Leary MP, Althof SE, Cappelleri JC, et al. The United States Self-Esteem
and Relationship Questionnaire Study Group. Self-esteem, confidence and
relationship satisfaction of men with erectile dysfunction treated with sildenafil
citrate: a multicenter, randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo
controlled study in the United States. J Urol 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):1058-1062.
- Baldwin K, Ginsberg P, Harkaway RC. Under-reporting of erectile dysfunction
among men with unrelated urologic conditions. Int J Impot Res 2003 Apr;15
(2):87-89.
- Shirai M, Takimoto Y, Ishii N, et al. Influence of erectile dysfunction on daily
life and general attitudes towards treatments. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi
2001 Nov;92(7):666-673.
- Ng CJ, Low WY, Tan NC, et al. The role of general practitioners in the
management of erectile dysfunction-a qualitative study. Int J Impot Res 2004
Feb;16(1):60-63.
- Zhang K, He ZJ, Xin ZC, et al. Physicians’ knowledge and attitude to erectile
dysfunction. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2002;8(3):181-185.
- Perelman M, Shabsigh R, Seftel A, et al. Attitudes of men with erectile
dysfunction: a cross-national survey. J Sex Med 2005 May;2(3):397-406.
- Metz ME, Seifert MH Jr Men’s expectations of physicians in sexual health
concerns. J Sex Marital Ther 1990 Summer;16(2):79-88.
- Perttula E. Physician attitudes and behaviour regarding erectile dysfunction in
at-risk patients from a rural community. Postgrad Med J 1999 Feb;75(880):
83-85.
- Ma RC, So WY, Yang X, et al. Erectile dysfunction predicts coronary heart
disease in typer 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 May 27;51(21): 2045-
2050.
- Athanasiadis L, Papaharitou S, Salpiggidis G, et al. Educating physicians to
treat erectile dysfunction patients: development and evaluation of a course on
communication and management strategies. J Sex Med 2006 Jan;3(1):47-55.