Summary
Urinary stone disease and urinary tract infection are
2 common urological problems. About 10% of the
population will have at least one episode of urinary stone
in their life time, and up to 50% of patients would have a
recurrence within 10 years after their initial stone
clearance. The use of non-contras t computed
tomography (NCCT) has largely replaced other imaging
as the first line investigation for ureteric colic. The
management of ureteric colic includes identifying patients
who need urgent decompression, adequate pain control
etc. The use of medical expulsive therapy, with either
alpha blocker or calcium channel blocker, can improve
the spontaneous expulsion rate of ureteric stones.
However, after the stone has been cleared, appropriate
dietary and life-style advice are important for the
prevention of stone recurrence.
In the diagnosis of cystitis, the majority of cases can
be diagnosed with the given clinical information and a
simple urine test. However, for patients with recurrent
cystitis symptoms, ur ine culture is impor tant to
differentiate treatment failure, reinfection, relapsing
infection and even from non-infective causes.
摘要
泌尿道結石和泌尿道感染是泌尿科的常見病。約10%的
人一生中會有一次泌尿系結石發作;近50%的患者在初次清除
結石後10 年內會復發。非增強電腦掃描(NCCT)已被用作輸
尿管絞痛的一線檢查手段,基本取代了其它影像學方法。輸尿
管絞痛的治療包括識別需要緊急減壓的患者、充分止痛等。內
科排出療法,如使用α— 阻滯劑或鈣離子通道拮抗劑,可以
提高各種輸尿管結石的自發排出率。但在清除結石後,正確的
飲食及生活方式建議對預防結石復發十分重要。
至于膀胱炎的診斷,大多數病例可以通過臨床資料和簡
單的尿液檢查而作出診斷。但是尿培養對反復出現膀胱炎症狀
的患者十分重要,可用以鑒別治療失敗、再次感染、感染復發
以及非感染性病因等情況。
Introduction
As our economy and health care services become
better, the life expectancy of our Hong Kong citizens is
also seen to improve. Together with the increased
awareness of the importance of urological problems, more
and more patients are presenting themselves with various
urological symptoms or diseases, including voiding
problems, prostate disease, sexual dysfunction, stone
disease and urological malignancies. With increasing
workload in the secondary and tertiary health care system,
primary care physicians will be expected to contribute
more to the management of these problems. Therefore, a
series of reviews on various urological conditions will be
presented to update the latest developments in their
management. The first review will focus on urinary stone
disease and infection, followed by an update on various
aspects of voiding dysfunction and finally management on
urological malignancy.
Urinary calculi
Urinary stone disease is an ancient disease, as can be
seen in the famous Hippocratic oath, which mentions this
as “I will not cut for stone, even for patients in whom the
disease is manifest; I will leave this operation to be
performed by practitioners, specialists in this art.” About
10% of the population will have at least one episode of
urinary stone in their life time. An epidemiological study
on renal calculi in the Chinese population revealed that
the prevalence rate was 8% and 5% in men and women
respectively.1 Moreover, up to 50% of patients would
have a recurrence within 10 years after their initial stone
or stones were cleared. Therefore, there is a big demand
for better stone care for the population, both in the acute
management and preventive strategies.
Management of ureteric colic
Ureteric colic typically manifests as an acute, severe,
and relatively constant or colicky pain starting in the renal
area at around the costovertebral angle and radiating
through the flank to the groin, then the scrotal area in men
or labial area in women. This pain is one of the
commonest presentations. However, other genito-urinary,
abdominal and gynaecological emergencies can also mimic
ureteric colic and therefore would impose diagnostic
difficulties. The first important step in the management
of ureteric colic is to confirm the diagnosis.
Imaging for the diagnosis of ureteric colic
While history and physical examination are essential
in the diagnostic process, some form of imaging is usually
necessary to confirm the presence of a stone. Although
the plain kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) x-ray is noninvasive,
contrast-free and readily available in emergency
departments, its accuracy in making a diagnosis of ureteric
stone is limited. The reported range of sensitivity and
specificity for the detection of ureteric stone are 45-62%,
67-71% respectively.2,3 Besides the limitation in
diagnosing radiolucent stones, this procedure could also
miss small or faint stones overlapped by bowel shadow,
faecal matter and bony landmarks, especially at the sacroiliac
joint. Moreover, the differentiation of a lower
ureteric stone and a phlebolith could sometimes be quite
difficult. Therefore, the KUB x-ray is best used in the
following-up of patients with known renal calculi or as
an adjunct to other imaging modalities.
Ultrasonography (US) is contrast and radiation free,
which is especially important for pregnant patients. With
the development of small and portable machines, US can
be readily performed at the bedside. It can also provide
informa tion for th e ma king o f oth er d iffe re nt ia l
diagnoses, such as biliary pathology, gynaecological
problems, etc. However, when investigating ureteric
stones, US can only help to identify the presence of
hydronephrosis secondary to obstruction on most
occasions. The causative stone is usually not easily
identified, unless it is close to the two ends of the
ureters. Therefore, supplementary KUB is usually
needed to identify the obstructing stone.
Intravenous urogram (IVU) has been the traditional
imaging of choice for diagnosing ureteric stone, which
could provide both anatomical and functional information.
However, there are several disadvantages for using the
IVU, such as contrast exposure, long procedure time, and
the fact that it is not readily available in an emergency
setting. This investigative modality is now being replaced
by non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT).
NCCT is now regarded as the gold standard for the
evaluation of acute loin pain because of its accuracy and
economic impact. (Figure 1) It is contrast-free and can
even be used on patients with renal failure. Nearly all
stones are hyperdense in NCCT, and small stones down
to 3mm in size can be detected. Its diagnostic role is
further added by the ability to detect both urinary and nonurinary
conditions other than stone disease, such as renal
neoplasm, diverticulitis and ovarian cysts.4 Prospective
studies showed that the sensitivity and specificity of stone
identification by helical CT were 94-98% and 85-100%
respectively.5-7 Positive predictive value had been
reported to be up to 100%.6 A comparison of these four
modalities of imaging is summarized in Table 1.
Initial treatment of ureteral colic
After making the diagn osis, the next st ep in
management is to identify those patients who require
urgent intervention, in particular, urosepsis. These
patients usually present with fever and chills. On physical
examination, they may have flushing, septic-looks,
tachycardia and even hypotension. As these patients can
deteriorate rapidly, urgen t referral to casualty or
urological care is important. Adequate fluid resuscitation,
prompt and appropriate antibiotic treatment or urgent
decompression of the system by either percutaneous
nephrostomy or ureteric stent, is usually needed to control
the sepsis.
Bo th n o n - s te ro id a l an t i - in f l amma to ry d ru g s
(NSAIDs) and opioids are effective and are recommended
analgesics for pain control in patients with ureteric colic.
Opioids are titratable and fast-acting, but they are more
likely to cause nausea and vomiting. On the other hand,
NSAIDs, which act directly on the pain mechanism
pathway by inhibiting prostaglandin release, can cause
gastrointestinal bleeding and renal impairment. Systemic
review of the relative efficacy of NSAIDs and opioids
revealed that both types of analgesics were effective in
pain reduction. However, patients receiving opioids, especially pethidine, were more likely to have adverse
events, e.g. vomiting. Therefore, NSAIDs are preferred
unless there are contraindications. Pethidine is better
avoided.
Although up to two-thirds of ureteric stones will pass
out spontaneously within four weeks from symptom onset,
the interval between symptom onset and stone passage is
highly variable. Therefore, these patients should be referred to specialty care for further monitoring and
management of the stone.
A tr ial of medic al exp ulsive therapy may be
considered for these patients, especially for those with
lower ureteric stones. Both alpha blockers (e.g.
tamsulosin, terazosin, and doxazosin) and calcium channel
blockers (e.g . nifedipine) have been investigated
extensively for their role in facilitating ureteric stones passage. The mechanism of action is thought to be
rel ated to their inh ibition on the u reter ic smo oth
muscle spasm. Systemic review showed that a 2- to
4-week course of alpha blockers or calcium channel
blo ckers was well-tolera ted. They could shor ten
ston e pass ag e time and in cr ease s to ne e xp ul sion
rate.9,10 Medical expulsive therapy is especially useful
fo r ure te ri c s to nes o f mod er ate s ize (> 5mm b ut
£ 10mm) at the distal end because stones less than
5mm can usually pass out spontaneously within four
weeks even without any intervention. The use of
alpha blockers has been shown to increase the stone
passage rate by 29%.9
Prevention of stone recurrence
Metabolic evaluation which include both blood
(serum calcium, phosphate level, etc) and urine tests
(both spot urine and 24 hour urine tests) is generally
indicated only in those patients with recurrent stone
formation.11 Another important investigation is stone
analysis, as the identification of the stone composition
will help to direct dietary advice and prophylactic
measures. Therefore, we should always try to send any
stone passed for chemical analysis whenever feasible.
For those patients with no identifiable underlying
cause, basic dietary advice should be given. Increased
f lu id the r ap y is p e rh ap s th e c he ap es t and s af es t
treatment and should be encouraged.12 Whil e the
amount of fluid intake may not be easily translated into
urine volume due to other routes of water loss, the
general advice is to have at least 2 litres of urine passed
every day or at least have sufficient fluid intake to
maintain a clear coloured urine. But soft drinks (e.g.
coke) have been shown to increase stone recurrence
r a t e an d th e r e fo r e s h o u ld b e a v o i d e d . 13 Oth e r
beverages, such as tea and coffee are less significant
unless they are taken in excess. Dietary calcium
restriction has now been shown to be ineffective, in
fact it will increase stone recurrence rate instead.12 Current recommendation is to have a normal dietary
calcium intake (about 800 to 1000 mg per day), unless
the patient is shown to have absorptive hypercalciuria.
Oxalate food should only be restricted when and if
taken in excess. Reduced salt and animal protein intake
is always advisable. The intake of citrus fruit is
recommended, as it can increase urine pH and decrease
stone recurrence.
Urinary tract infection
Lower urinary tract infection (LUTI) is probably one
of the commonest urological conditions in the primary
care setting. Lower urinary tract infection is defined as
an infection confined to the bladder and urethral regions.
Females have a much higher chance of getting an urinary
tract infection (UTI) than males, with almost one-third of
women having one episode of UTI requiring antibiotic
therapy before the age of 24 and up to 50% of the female
population suffering from at least one urinary tract
infection in their lifetime.14 Diagnosis of simple cystitis
is usually straightforward and relies heavily on clinical
info rma t ion o bt a in e d f rom h i sto ry and p hy s i ca l
examination. The classical presentations of lower urinary
tract infection include dysuria, urinary frequency,
urgency, haematuria, and suprapubic pain. Common
precipitating events associated with LUTI are recent
sexual activity, pregnancy, use of diaphragm with
spermicide, etc.15 For simple LUTI, physical examination
i s us ua lly un remarkabl e ex ce pt mi ld s up rapu bi c
tenderness. However, hints for underlying problems may
be identified during examination. A distended bladder
may suggest a possible voiding dysfunction. In males, it
is essential to identify phimosis and meatal stenosis,
which are predisposing factors for recurrent infections. A
rectal examination may also help to identify prostatic
tenderness, which suggests acute prostatitis. Neurological
examination may sometimes identify patients with voiding
dysfunction secondary to neurological conditions.
Investigation
Apart from clinical information obtained from a
focused history taking and physical examination, certain
diagnostic adjuncts may help to establish the diagnosis.
Urinalysis and urine culture are probably the commonest
investigations done in the emergency department.
Urine dipstick
Urine dipstick for assessment of urinary tract
infection involves the detection of leukocyte esterase
activity and/or nitrite, which is produced by nitriteproducing
pathogens, in particular Gram-negative
bacteria. This is a rapid screening test to detect pyuria,
and haematuria. The reported sensitivity of dipstick test
for leukocyte esterase alone ranges from 48-86% and
specificity varies from 17-93%.16 On the other hand, the
dipstick nitrite test has a sensitivity of 18-81%, specificity of 87-100% and positive predictive value of 50-96%.17, 18
Meta-analysis showed that the combination of nitrite and
leukocyte esterase tests increased the sensitivity at the
expense of increased false positive results. However,
combination of negative dipstick test for nitrite and
leukocyte esterase shows a negative predictive value for
urinary tract infection of 96.9% and a specificity of
98.7%.19 This signifies that, in the absence of both urine
nitrite and leukocyte esterase activity, an urinary tract
infection, is unlikely.
Other findings from the dipstick test for urinary
t r ac t in fe c t io n in c lud e p re s e n c e o f mic ro s c op i c
haematuria, proteinuria, and a rise in the urine pH, but
these findings are less specific as compared to the urine
nitrite and leukocyte esterase in diagnosing urinary
tract infection, and are usually not considered to be
important in this setting. Cautions should also be taken
when interpreting results of the dipstick test in patients
with urinary catheters, and pregnant women in whom
the accuracy is much lower.
Urine culture
Routine urine culture may not be necessary for
s imp l e c y s t i t i s in y o u n g n o n -p r e g n an t f ema l e s .
Howe v e r, in c omp l i c a t e d c o n d i t io ns s u c h as in
children, males, during pregnancy and in patients
suffering from recurrent cystitis, urine culture is still
regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis of a
bacterial urinary tract infection. It is important to
identify the underlying pathogens and guide subsequent
investigations. It can also facilitate the differentiation
of a re-infection from a relapse in the context of
recurrent infections.
The traditional cut-off level of significant bacteriuria
count of 105 colony forming units of bacteria per millilitre
of urine is mainly for diagnosing upper tract infection and
may not be applicable to cystitis. As most individuals
tend to drink more fluid when experiencing cystitis
symptoms, this fluid loading may result in reduced urinary
bacterial count.20 Moreover, frequent voiding during
cystitis can itself decrease the bacterial count in urine.
Therefore, some authors suggest that a lower bacteriuria
cut-off level of 103 uropathogens, should be adopted for
diagnosing cystitis.21
Imaging and other investigations
Further imaging following a simple cystitis in the
female is usually not indicated. However, further studies
are necessary to identify any predisposing cause of
infection in children and male patients who have
confirmed cystitis. In men, uncomplicated urinary tract
infection is uncommon, and early evaluation should be
advocated. Traditionally, intravenous urography was
recommended to assess possible upper urinary tract
obstruction and abnormality identified in plain film or
ultrasonography. Apart from providing an anatomical
assessment, it also gave functional evaluation, though
involving the use of ionizing radiation and contrast media.
Cu r r e n t e v i d e n c e s h ows t h a t c omb i n a t i o n o f
ultrasonography with plain films is good enough and as
accurate as intravevous urography in detecting important
urological abnormalities in men, which is probably also
a safer option. These imaging modalities, coupled with
the additional information from urinary flow rate, seldom
miss important urinary tract abnormalities.22 Any further
investigation should also include a fasting blood sugar
le vel to rule ou t und erlyin g d iabet es or gluco se
intolerance.
Antimicrobial therapy
There is controversy over the optimal duration of
antibiotic therapy. For young and non-pregnant females
with acute uncomplicated cystitis, the preferred treatment
is a three-day course of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
(Septrin) or quinolones, which are contraindicated in
pregnancy.23 A longer course of therapy, usually 7-10
days, is recommended in diabetic women, during
pregnancy, and patients with symptoms for more than
7 days or with other evidence of complicated urinary tract
infections. However, in male patients with uncomplicated in f e c t io n , a mi n imum o f 7 d a y s o f t h e r a p y i s
recommended as the presence of complicating factors is
relatively more common.
Recurrent cystitis
When patients present with recurrent episodes of
cystitis, more detailed investigations should be performed.
Urine cultures during every attack of cystitis are essential
for establishing the diagnosis, as well as aiding subsequent
management. These should be carefully reviewed
especially in patients with documented positive urine
cultures in every, or the majority of attacks. If recurrent
cystitis is caused by the same pathogen, this is highly
suggestive of treatment failure or relapsing infection.
Treatment failure can be due to resistant microbial strains,
inappropriate antibiotics prescription or poor drug
compliance. However, if there is no evidence to suggest treatment failure, the possibility of relapsing infection
should be seriously considered. Relapse is often
associated with urinary tract abnormalities, which are
either structural or functional. The commonest causes
include urolithiasis, vesico-ureteric reflux, presence of
significant residual urine and bladder diverticulum.
Therefore, these patients should be referred to the
urologist for further evaluation. Unless the underlying
cause is corrected, the pathogens may persist and these
patients would continue to have recurrent episodes of
infection. If the underlying complicating factors could not
be corrected, long-term suppressive antibiotics therapy is
needed to help to prevent frequent infections.
Re-infection is diagnosed when patients have
repeated positive urine cultures of different microorganisms.
Possible causes for this condition include
diabetes, poor hygiene, and immuno-compromised state.
Treatment should be directed to rule out undiagnosed
diabetes or an immune-compromised status.
Patient education is vital. Patients should be
instructed regarding the correct way of cleansing the
perineum after micturition, the practice of post-coital
voiding, and the importance of adequate fluid intake.
However, for patients without any identifiable cause,
a prolonged course of low dose prophylactic antibiotics
(at least 6 months) should be considered. The choice
of prophylactic antibiotics includes nitrofurantoin,
tr imeth op rim/s ul famethox az ol e, or th e qu ino lo ne
group, etc.23
However, there are patients who are labelled as
suffering from ¡°recurrent cystitis¡± but never have had
actual documented positive cultures. These patients
should be referred to an urologist for further workup and
investigation of the underlying irritating lower urinary
tract symptoms. If haematuria is present, urgent referral
may be necessary to rule out serious bladder pathology
such as a tumour (the so called ¡°malignant cystitis¡±) or
bladder stone, etc. Urine for cytology, plain radiography
of a KUB view should also be performed to facilitate
subsequent urological management.
Key messages
- About 10% of the population will have at least one
episode of urinary stone in their life time, and up to
50% of patients would have a recurrence within 10
years after their stones were initially cleared.
- Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), is now
regarded as the gold standard for evaluation of acute
loin pain.
- Infection of an obstructed urinary system will require
an urgent urological referral and consideration for
urgent decompression, either via percutaneous
nephrostomy or ureteric stenting, in order to control
the sepsis.
- The usage of medical expulsive therapy, either with
alpha blocker or calcium channel blocker, can
improve the spontaneous expulsion rate of ureteric
stones.
- Basic dietary and life-style advice are important for
the prevention of stone recurrence.
- The traditional cut-off level of significant bacteriuria
of 105 colony forming units of bacteria per ml urine
is mainly for diagnosing upper tract infection and
may not be applicable to cystitis.
- For patients with recurrent cystitis symptoms, urine
culture is important to differentiate treatment failure,
reinfection, relapse of infection and even from noninfective
causes.
Chi-fai Ng, MBChB (CUHK), FHKCS, FRCS (Ed) (Urol), FHKAM (Surg)
Associate Professor,
Correspondence to: Professor Chi-fai Ng, Department of Surgery, Clinical Science
Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR.
Reference
- Peng J, Zhou HB, Cheng JQ, et al. Study on the epidemiology and risk
factors of renal calculi in special economic zone of Shenzhen city. Chung-
Hua Liu Hsing Ping Hsueh Tsa Chih Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2003;
24(12):1112-1114.
- Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, et al. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank
pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology
1997;204(1):27-31.
- Roth CS, Bowyer BA, Berquist TH. Utility of the plain abdominal
radiograph for diagnosing ureteral calculi. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14
(4):311-315.
- Rucker CM, Menias CO, Bhalla S. Mimics of renal colic: alternative
diagnoses at unenhanced helical CT. Radiographics 2004;24 Suppl
1:S11-S28.
- Greenwell TJ,Woodhams S, Denton ER, et al. One year’s clinical experience
with unenhanced spiral computed tomography for the assessment of acute
loin pain suggestive of renal colic. BJU International 2000;85(6):632-636.
- Fielding JR, Fox LA, Heller H, et al. Spiral CT in the evaluation of flank
pain: overall accuracy and feature analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;
21(4):635-638.
- Pfister SA, Deckart A, Laschke S, et al. Unenhanced helical computed
tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain:
accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol
2003;13(11):2513-2520.
- Holdgate A, Pollock T. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
versus opioids for acute renal colic. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews 2005;(2):CD004137.
- Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. 2007 Guideline for the
management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 2007; 52(6):1610-1631.
- Singh A, Alter HJ, Littlepage A. A systematic review of medical therapy to
facilitate passage of ureteral calculi. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50(5):552-563.
- Teichman JM. Clinical practice. Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus.
NEJM 2004;350(7):684-693.
- Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, et al. A prospective study of dietary
calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. NEJM
1993;328(12):833-838.
- Shuster J, Jenkins A, Logan C, et al. Soft drink consumption and urinary
stone recurrence: a randomized prevention trial. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45
(8):911-916.
- Shaikh N, Morone NE, Bost JE, et al. Prevalence of urinary tract infection
in childhood: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008;27(4):302-308.
- Hooton TM, Scholes D, Hughes JP, et al. A prospective study of risk factors
for symptomatic urinary tract infection in young women. NEJM 1996;335
(7):468-474.
- Grabe M, Bishop MC, Bjerklund-Johansen TE, et al. Guidelines on the
Management of Urinary and Male Genital Tract Infections. 2008. European
Association of Urology.
- Nys S, van Merode T, Bartelds AI, et al. Urinary tract infections in general
practice patients: diagnostic tests versus bacteriological culture. J Antimicrob
Chemother 2006;57(5):955-958.
- Simerville JA, Maxted WC, Pahira JJ. Urinalysis: a comprehensive review.
Am Fam Physician 2005;71(6):1153-1162.
- Sharief N, Hameed M, Petts D. Use of rapid dipstick tests to exclude urinary
tract infection in children. Br J Biomed Sci 1998;55(4):242-246.
- CattellWR, Fry IK, Spiro FI, et al. Effect of diuresis and frequent micturition
on the bacterial content of infected urine: a measure of competence of
intrinsic hydrokinetic clearance mechanisms. Br J Urol 1970;42(3):290-295.
- Rubin RH, Shapiro ED, Andriole VT, et al. Evaluation of new anti-infective
drugs for the treatment of urinary tract infection. Infectious Diseases Society
of America and the Food and Drug Administration. Clin Infect Dis 1992;
15 Suppl 1:S216-S227.
- Andrews SJ, Brooks PT, Hanbury DC, et al. Ultrasonography and abdominal
radiography versus intravenous urography in investigation of urinary tract
infection in men: prospective incident cohort study. BMJ 2002;324(7335):
454-456.
- Nicolle LE. Uncomplicated urinary tract infection in adults including
uncomplicated pyelonephritis. Urol Clin North Am 2008;35(1):1-12.