Adolescent drug addiction: suggestions for the primary care physician
David Chim
HK Pract 2009;31:97-99
Adolescent drug abusers represent a challenging population for the primary care
physician, and this is emerging as a major concern for public health. While traditional
drugs of abuse such as heroin and cocaine are on the decline in the United States,
abuse of prescription drugs is on the rise.1 Prescription drugs are easily
accessed by young persons by pilfering from their parents' medicine cabinets.2
The primary care physician (PCP) is often the first source of medical screening
and treatment the adolescent drug addict will have access to. As practitioners of
family medicine, we must be prepared to face the special task of screening and treating
this special population who have unique needs stemming from their immature neurocognitive
and psychosocial stage of development. Our intervention will likely have a direct
impact on the public health aspect of the addiction epidemic. The following are
some highlights the well-informed family physician should keep in mind when confronted
with our youth and young adult patients with substance abuse or dependence.
Addiction is a brain disease, not just a maladapted social behaviour.
The adolescent brain matures at about 25 years old.3 Adolescent addiction
develops in an immature brain, and stymies normal brain maturation. The normal,
drug-free brain undergoes a long-term process of development from birth to early
adulthood. The resulting refinements of neurochemistry and neural pathways are represented
developmentally as behaviour changes: maturing adolescents go from more compulsive
actions to more reasoning before action. Key brain regions highly associated with
decision-making, self-control, planning, and judgment experiences extensive development
during adolescence.
Addicts will have decreased ability to restrain impulsivity and to reflect upon
the consequences of behaviour due to interference of brain maturation. In addition,
tolerance and dependence develops at a faster rate in the adolescent brain. PCPs
should remind patients and their parents that individuals who begin drinking before
the age of 15 are four times more likely to develop alcohol dependence than those
who begin drinking at age 21.4
Adolescents are at higher risk of addiction. PCPs should focus
in their history taking key risk factors for substance abuse or dependence including
a family history of addictive disease; a history of psychological physical and/or
sexual trauma; any concurrent or pre-existing psychiatric disorders; and any evidence
of attention deficit or other learning disabilities. In California, the 80,000 plus
foster care children are an especially vulnerable group developing substance abuse
and dependence; it is estimated about 5000 of these children per year become part
of the homeless, addicted population when they reach adulthood.5
Our principal goal is prevention by discouraging, delaying, or detecting substance
misuse. PCPs must be flexible in their approach to adolescent addicts;
to be judgmental and have zero tolerance for drug misuse will inevitably lead to
a high detection and treatment failure rate. In the best case scenario, the PCP
will discourage any potential addict from developing dependence by educating the
patient and his or her family on the tremendous risks of taking addictive drugs.
However, with more adventurous adolescents, emphasis must be placed on delaying
their onset of regular substance use, to allow their brains to mature normally in
order to have a chance to become successful later in life.
When discouraging and delaying use fails, the next step is early detection of high-risk
use. Once detected, interventions such as pharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioural
therapy should be implemented in a timely manner to prevent further substance misuse
progression. PCPs who have limited experience in this field, or who are facing severe
cases, should not hesitate to refer to specialists immediately in order to limit
damage to the patient physical and psychological health.
In the future, family medicine practitioners will most likely need to conduct adolescent
annual examinations with age appropriate educational materials and psychological
surveys in addition to evaluations of weight, height, etc.
Your intervention will often be effective, save lives, and decrease public health
costs. While this may seem rather obvious, the lay public, adolescent
or adult, often do not realize massive amounts of stimulants or depressants may
immediately end their lives, or lead them down an irreversible path of health failure,
or other severe consequences to themselves or others.
In the Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers, one of the premiere models of primary
care in California, 56% of those in treatment recorded 30 consecutive days of abstinence
from drugs and alcohol 6 months after treatment.6
In the United States, two national studies further prove the efficacy and effectiveness
of treatment. The Office of National Drug Control Policy in 2002 reported medical
intervention resulted in 48% decrease in drug use as well as 53% decrease in medical
visits due to drugs; in addition, there was an 80% decrease in criminal activity.
According to the National Institute of Drug Abuse, for every one-dollar spent on
addiction treatment, twelve dollars is saved in healthcare and drug-related crime.7
Youth treatment must address both addiction and psychiatric illness.
The co-occurrence of substance abuse and mental disorder is rather common among
adolescents, and treatment requires the complete and seamless integration of psychiatric
care. It is estimated about 80% of adolescents with substance abuse have concurrent
psychiatric disorders in the United States.8 The argument about treating
one condition before the other is outdated. The general consensus among addiction
specialists is that both the addiction and psychiatric illness must be addressed
at the same time, regardless of speculation of whether or not one causes the other.
Addiction is a Family Disease. As a group, adolescents are highly
sensitive to psycho-social cues, especially from family and peers. To maximize success,
treatments will often need to incorporate parental involvement, and perhaps school
and other activities the patient is involved in. Family physicians are often the
gatekeepers to comprehensive assessment and treatment. Special attention must also
be given to the addict parents. They are often addicts themselves, which causes
their children to become mentally ill and more susceptible to addiction. Children
of addicted parents should be one of the first target groups for screening and treatment.
PCPs and their ancillary care associates who provide intensive education, family
counselling, and monitoring will effectively counter this growing concern of public
health.
David Chim, D.O.
Medical Director
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Correspondence to : Dr David Chim, 2130 Huntington Drive, Suite 307, South
Pasadena, CA 91030, USA.
References
- http://www.drugabuse.gov/infofacts/HSYouthTrends.html.
- 2006 Partnership for a Drug Free America:
http://www.drugfree.org/Portal/DrugIssue/Research/parent_teen_discussions/Parent_Teen_Discussions_About_Drugs_and_Alcohol.
- Bennett CM, Baird AA. Anatomical changes in the emerging adult brain: a voxel-based
morphometry study. Hum Brain Mapp 2006;27:766-777.
- http://alcoholism.about.com/library/nnews9801.htm.
- http://www.heysf.org/pdfs/HEY_Stats_Sheet_Health_Homelessness_2009.pdf.
- http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a24/pdf/083007Item3d.pdf.
- http://www.drugabuse.gov/newsroom/06/NR7-14.html.
- http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/content/extract/30/3/83.
|