We are all patients
Rodger Charlton
HK Pract 2014;36:81-82
There is nothing like being a patient to focus our minds to remind us how important
it is to have ready access to a doctor and why, when illness strikes.
Access to physicians is changing worldwide, not least through social media, the
use of email and smartphones. But, the basic idea of the doctor-patient relationship,
the consultation, is essentially the same. However, the value of access to physicians
varies from country to country and also within countries where socio-economic status
is a large determinant.
The role of family physicians and secondary care specialists differs in that family
physicians are likely to see the same patient many times and learn a new part of
their life story or narrative in relation to their health and possible illness.
It is the family physician's, or personal physician's ability to provide continuity
of care through the episodic nature of an illness and ongoing pro-active and reactive
care for those with long-term conditions that is most valued by patients.
Doctors are generally held in very high esteem by the public and for this reason
patients have considerable expectations in relation to the consultation and getting
satisfaction from each meeting with their doctor. I attended a lecture many years
ago given by a doctor who worked for social services and I still recall the four
points that she made about the possible outcomes of the consultation. These were:
(1) being given a prescription, (2) getting a referral to a specialist, (3) being
given a sick note and (4) the fourth, which is perhaps the most important of all;
receiving a bit of love. The best doctor is the one who perhaps himself has been
there, in the seat of the person opposite with an illness and so one who is able
to understand, or failing this, the one who at lease tries to understand a patient's
plight and circumstances.
Times of distress, which may be brought on by illness or complicated by psychosocial
issues in patients' lives, are times of extreme vulnerability and our patients may
hang on every word that a doctor says. But, it is not just the words that the doctor
utters, but the manner in which the words are delivered that matters, showing whether
the doctor is seen as sympathetic and where possible, empathetic. So frequently
in medical school teaching, we emphasise communication, both verbal and non-verbal,
but do we ensure it is always delivered to the highest quality possible?
A general practice (GP) professor, Professor Roger Neighbour, is best known in the
United Kingdom for his book and consultation model, "The Inner Consultation".1
There are many consultation models and it could be argued that there is no ideal
model and eventually each doctor develops their own individual style. I was privileged
to listen to Professor Neighbour recently speaking at a postgraduate meeting and
he has come up with an alternative model which is very straight forward and has
come about following considerable reflection. It is: (i) shut up, (ii) listen, (iii)
know your medicine and (iv) care. It is the latter that is so important and is contained
within the College mottos of the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australian Royal
Colleges of General Practice; "Cum Scientia Caritas", which means "scientific care
with loving kindness".2
But it is more than sympathy, empathy, care and, the term that now attracts much
of our attention in medical education, "professionalism." Sadly, it is possible
to demonstrate professionalism, but sometimes without truly caring. And perhaps
it might be best to go back to the phrase 'bedside manner', which has been superseded
by the word professionalism. Genuine professionalism must include compassion.
Compassion is almost undefinable, but the current pace and pressure of modern medicine
means it is squeezed out as we see more patients, more frequently and with shorter
consultation time. Compassion is more than empathy, it is the wish to relieve suffering,
where the degree of compassion is our desire to want to help and so, in turn, to
show kindness (love) and care. This is the embodiment of altruism in health care.
Caritas, continuity and compassion are what GPs do best and it is time to embed
it as a theme in health care for the foreseeable future. With an increasingly frail
elderly population with multiple co-morbidities through long-term conditions, the
emphasis should be on caritas balanced appropriately with scientia. The 3Cs for
us in the future will be continuity, caring and compassion and these Cs should be
the new professionalism.
Rodger Charlton, MD, FRCGP, FRNZCGP
Professor & Director of Undergraduate Primary Care Education,
School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Correspondence to : Prof Rodger Charlton,
rodger.charlton@nottingham.ac.uk
References
- Neighbour R (1987) The Inner Consultation, Kluwer Academic Publishers 1987, Dordrecht/Boston/London.
- McCulloch GL. Cum scientia caritas. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1969 Dec; 18(89):315-320.
|