December 2015, Volume 37, No. 4
Original Article

Characteristics of female smokers and the predictors of quitting in a clinic based smoking cessation programme in Hong Kong

KS Ho 何健生,Helen CH Chan 陳靜嫻,Bandai WC Choi 蔡華智,Joe KW Ching 程錦榮

HK Pract 2015;37:123-133

Summary

Objective: This study aimed to explore the characteristics of local female smokers and the predictors of quitting.

Design: Retrospective case review

Subjects: 2,222 female smokers who volunteered to come to Tung Wah Group of Hospitals Integrated Centres on Smoking Cessations during the period 01.01.2010 to 30.06.2013 for quitting smoking.

Main outcome measures: Self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence rate at week 26 was taken as the outcome measure.

Results: 2,222 cases were analysed. 67.6% were between aged 25-44 years. 50.8% smoke 11-20 cigarettes per day. 54.4% had high FTND scores. Perceived high risk situations were mainly smokers around, pressure (time, work, personal relationship, finance), feeling sad and when arguing with others. Independent predictors of quitting were coexisting mental illness, number of cigarettes smoked per day, time pressure, sad and despair, smokers around, insomnia, perceived importance of quitting.

Conclusion: This study provides information for the service providers to match gender specific interventions. We need to screen for depression during smoking cessation and to offer behavioural treatment to deal with depressed mood and anxiety so as to increase their chances of abstinence apart from medical treatment of nicotine dependence.

Keywords: female smokers, predictors, characteristics, quit smoking

摘要

目的: 探索香港吸煙女性的特性和戒煙預示。

設計: 回顧性病例研究。

研究對象: 2010年1月1日至2013年6月30日,在東華綜合戒煙中心參加自願戒煙計畫的2,222位女性。

主要測量內容: 戒煙26週,7日時點戒煙率自我報告。

結果: 共有2,222合資格病例。67.6%年齡年齡由25到44歲;50.8%每日抽煙11到20支。54.4%有高FTND分數。高風險因素包括:朋輩抽煙;工作時間,人際關係和金錢的壓力; 感覺傷心和與他人爭吵後 。影響戒煙成效的獨立預示包括:患有精神病,抽煙的數量,時間壓力,傷心和失落,朋友抽煙,失眠,對戒煙的重視程度。

結論: 本研究有助戒煙中心提供性別匹配的支援。假如發現戒煙者有抑鬱症,尼古丁替代療法外,提供行為治療可減抑鬱和焦慮,可增加成功戒煙的機會。

關鍵字:女吸煙人士,預示,特性,戒煙


Introduction

Smoking is the single most preventable cause of disease and premature death. Worldwide it is estimated that men smoke nearly four times as much as women although the ratios of female-to-male smoking prevalence rates vary dramatically across countries.1 While global male smoking rates have either reached a peak or are in a slow decline, the prevalence of tobacco use among women is, on the contrary, increasing.2

There is evidence that tobacco companies target their advertisement to females and adolescents in recent years. The ominous prediction is that by 2025, 20% of the female population will be smokers.3 This would mean that by 2025 there could be 532 million women smokers.4

There are numerous smoking related health risks specific to women, such as pregnancy related problems, breast cancer, cervical cancer and early menopause.5,6 A recent systematic review and meta-analysis also found that, compared with non-smokers, women smokers have a 25% greater relative risk (RR) of coronary heart disease than male smokers.7

Although the prevalence of female smokers in Hong Kong is only at 3%, the absolute numbers of female smokers is increasing, from 80,100 in 1998 to 96,800 in 2012 (Thematic Household Survey 1998 and 2012 by Census and Statistic Department of Hong Kong SAR). As a result there have been numerous calls for action on women’s tobacco use.8

There are relatively few data on the epidemiology of cigarette smoking in Asian women. A few local studies only involve focus group, telephone survey or a relatively small gender specific treatment programme initiated by the Women Against Tobacco Taskforce (WATT).6,9

As to the predictors of quitting, some overseas studies have demonstrated that women are less able to quit smoking than men.10 However, the predictors of quitting in female smokers are rather inconsistent. For example, education level has been found to be a predictor in some studies while in other studies it is not a predictor. Having a better understanding on the biological and psychosocial profiles of female smokers and the predictors of quitting will help offer more appropriate gender specific intervention.

Methodology

This study was a retrospective cohort study on female smokers and would observe their quit rate and factors related to quitting. All female patients attending any of the eight Tung Wah Integrated Centres for Smoking Cessation (ICSC) from 1 Jan 2010 to 30 June 2013 were included. Those who were mentally unstable or cognitively impaired were excluded.

The ICSCs provided free pharmacotherapy and counselling service to smokers who were Hong Kong permanent residents. The integrated model of counselling and pharmacotherapy was adopted at all the centres.11 Counselling was conducted by registered social workers who were all trained in tobacco cessation. Motivational interviewing technique and cognitive behavioural therapy were used.12 The medications provided included both nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and non-NRT. Parallel intensive counselling sessions were given once a week for two weeks and then once every two weeks until the end of treatment phase which lasted from eight to twelve weeks. Smokerlyser by Bedfont Scientific Ltd was used to document tobacco abstinence at each visit.

A structured questionnaire which had been tested and adopted by local researchers13,14,15 was given to consenting patients at the first visit to collect the following baseline information: (i) Socio-demographics variables (ii) Health-related variables (iii) Smoking-related variables: age started smoking, years of smoking, cohabiting with other smokers, cigarette per day, Fagerstrom Test on Nicotine Dependence (FTND) score, number and time of previous quit attempts, reason for quitting, high risk situations (HRS); (iv) Psychosocial variables (v) Smoking Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ-12).16,17 The questionnaire was self-administered; illiterate patients were helped by our staff to fill the questionnaire. Telephone follow up would be conducted at week 26 to ascertain smoking status.

Data of all eligible participants from 1 Jan 2010 to and 30 June 2013 were reviewed. The outcome measure was self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence rate at week 26 through telephone follow-up. Those who were lost to follow-up were treated as non-quitters basing on an intention-to-treat analysis.

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0. Possible predictors listed above were described using descriptive statistics, in which categorical variables were expressed as percentages while continuous variables expressed as mean with standard deviations. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed for all studied predictors. Predictors with p-value <0.10 were then included in multivariable logistic regression analysis. A p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

2,222 eligible cases were identified at the first visit, with zero patients meeting our exclusion criteria. The age ranged from 12 to 89 years with a mean of 38.6 (SD=10.9). 41.4% were married. 47.5% completed secondary school education and 8.4% had college degrees. 30.5% had a personal monthly income between HK$10,000 to HK$19,999, with a median of HK$8,000 to HK$10,000. 76.7% reported feeling tense. 70.6% reported having a depressed mood in the past two weeks while 25.8% reported to have mental diseases. 65.2% smoked more than 11 cigarettes per day. 54.4% had high FTND score (6-10). The mean score of self-perceived difficulty of quitting was 76.9 out of 100 (SD 21.3) and the mean score of self-perceived confidence was 38.8 out of 100 (SD 22.9). Perceived high risk situations (HRS) were mainly having smokers around (smokers who smoke in proximity), pressure from time, work, personal relationship and finance, feeling sad and despair, when arguing with others and when feeling bored. The quit rate at 26th week was 25.7% (n=571) and the response rate at 8th week was 83.8% (n=1862) and 26th week 74.4% (n=1653) (Table 1,2,3).

Univariate analysis in Table 4 shows that the predictors of failure to quit are high FTND score, smokers in close proximity, time pressure, insomnia, feeling bored, feeling sad and despair, being invited to smoke, having alcohol and coffee, low internal efficacy and external efficacy, having mental illness, low confidence and anticipated high difficulty with quitting. Multivariable logistic regression shows that the independent predictors of quitting are having mental illness (adjusted OR 0.695, 95% CI 0.525-0.920), FTND (adjusted OR 0.978, 95% CI 0.960-0.996), time pressure (adjusted OR 0.653, 95% CI 0.452-0.943), sad and despair (adjusted OR 0.684, CI 0.491-0.952), smokers around (adjusted OR 0.657, CI 0.485-0.890), insomnia (adjusted OR 0.617, CI 0.437-0.871), perceived importance of quitting (adjusted OR 1.008, CI 1.001-1.016) (Table 5). Table 6 gives a brief summary of the predictors on quitting.

Discussion

Our study is a clinic-based female smoking cessation analysis and is to the authors’ knowledge the first study of this kind in Hong Kong. Conflicting evidence exists concerning the predictors of quitting for female smokers, and have been postulated to be related to methodological heterogeneity between studies with different populations and interventions.18,19 Our study tried to include a more comprehensive list of related variables for analysis.

Many female smokers in Hong Kong regarded negative emotions and stress as important factors that influence continued tobacco use.6,20 Some studies indicated that social situation, work stresses, mood, and negative affect were more related to quitting in women.23 Our results are consistent with existing literature, showing that time pressure, feeling sad and despair, having mental illness were predictors of failure to quit. It is noteworthy that Bohadana A et al. has suggested that women smokers appear to have more behavioural component, and lower nicotine dependence than men; thus both nicotine and behavioural treatment should be tailored to women to increase their chances of abstinence.24,25,26

Socioeconomic status and tobacco dependence was found in previous studies to be predictors of smoking cessation21,22 In our study, level of tobacco dependence was a predictor while educational level was not. In fact, some studies also suggested that education level might not be a predictor in female smokers.

Social support had been mentioned to be predictive of quitting in some studies.27 However, the Multi-site Lung Health Study revealed that the presence of support from spouse or friends was associated with better outcome among men but not in women.28 Our study also indicated that social support from friends, spouse and families did not give a better outcome in women. These differences might be due to variations in methodology,setting of the studies, cultures and different ethnic groups.

Our study involved a relatively large sample size with a more comprehensive, though not exhaustive, quit-related variables. The basic demographic differed slightly from the Smoking and Health Survey in Hong Kong Women by the Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health (COSH) conducted in 2014 in that we had 6% less married women, 11.9% less secondary school leavers, 5% more employed women. 54% of our studied population had high FTND score whereas only 15.6 % of the COSH population had high FTND score. Since it is a clinic-based study, it can provide useful data for clinical practice. The limitations of our study are that the participants are more motivated smokers and they have relatively low median personal income. This might not represent the female smoking population as a whole. A small percentage of clients would re-enroll during the study period although we allowed re-enrollment only after one year had lapsed. However all bio-psychosocial characteristics of these clients would be assessed as a new case s ince things could have changed over the year. All treatments given were not randomised. The quit rates were self-reported and were not biochemically validated. However, it has been shown that in some studies, using self-reports to evaluate smoking appeared to be accurate.29 Job nature was not included in the variables for study. In fact the jobs of our client were very diverse and sample size for some jobs will be too small for subgroup analysis.

Conclusion

To improve the performance and efficacy of smoking cessation services, the study on the characteristics of local female smokers and the identification of predictors of success is crucial as it provides information for the service providers to match their intervention approach to different characteristics of smokers to yield better outcome.

This study reveals that psychosocial factors are important predictors on the quit rate of female smokers. It also serves to create awareness among family physicians to take a gender-sensitive approach to help female smokers. In fact, an Australian study had pointed out that female smokers are less likely to receive opportunistic discussion on smoking cessation by family physicians during primary care consultations.30 Even in pregnancy, GP intervention rates are well below recommended levels.31

Women have higher rates of depression than men and are more likely to use smoking as a means of handling negative affect.32,33,34 It is important to screen for mental illness; help them cope with depressed mood and to monitor their mood during smoking cessation intervention. It is essential to counsel on avoidance of environmental cues associated with smoking, dealing with time pressure and insomnia apart from pharmacotherapy to tackle nicotine dependence.


KS Ho, MBBS, FHKAM(Family Medicine) FHKAM(Medicine)
Medical Officer
TWGHs Integrated Centres on Smoking Cessation

Helen CH Chan, MSo SC, MPH, RSW
Supervisor
TWGHs Integrated Centres on Smoking Cessation

Bandai WC Choi, MSo SC, MPH, RSW
Counsellor
TWGHs Integrated Centres on Smoking Cessation

Joe KW Ching, MBBS, FHKAM(Family Medicine)
Medical Officer
TWGHs Integrated Centres on Smoking Cessation

Correspondence to :Dr KS Ho, 17/F, Tung Sun Commercial, 194-200 Lockhart Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong SAR, China.
E-mail: rayhoks@yahoo.com.hk


References
  1. Guindon GE, Boisclair D. Past, current and future trends in tobacco use: HNP discussion paper. Washington: The World Bank; 2003. Available from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4q57d5vp [accessed 17 November 2010].
  2. Amos A, Greaves L, Nichter M, et al. Women and tobacco: a call for including gender in tobacco control research, policy and practice. Tobacco Control. 2012;21:236-243.
  3. Glynn T, Seffrin JR, Brawley OW, et al. The Globalization of tobacco use : 21 challenges for the 21st century. 2010.
  4. Mackay J, Amos A. Invited review series: Tobacco and Lung Health, women and tobacco. Respirology. 2003;8(2):123-130.
  5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. How tobacco smoke causes disease: The biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2010.
  6. Chan S, Lam TH, Wong D, et al. Smoking and health survey in Hong Kong women. May 2014 COSH Report No.15.
  7. Huxley RR, Woodward M. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lancet 2011;378(9799):1297-1305.
  8. Amos A, Greaves L, Nichter M, et al. Women and tobacco: a call for including gender in tobacco control research, policy and practice. Tob Control. 2012;21(2):236-43.12.
  9. Lau EMC, Lee P, Lynn H, et al. The epidemiology of cigarette smoking in Hong Kong Chinese women. Prev Med (Baltim). 2003;37:383-388.
  10. Schnoll RA, Patterson F. Sex heterogeneity in pharmocogenetic smoking cessation clinical trials. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;104(Suppl 1):S94-S99.
  11. Fiore MC, Bailey WC, Bennett G, et al. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 Update. A U.S. Public Health Service Report.
  12. Lindson-Hawley N, Thompson TP, Begh R. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation (Review), The Cochrane Collaboration and published in The Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 3.
  13. Lam TH, Abdullah AS, Chan SS, et al. Adherence to nicotine replacement therapy versus quitting smoking among Chinese smokers: a preliminary investigation. Psychopharmacology. 2005;177(4): 400-408.
  14. Chan SSC, Lam TH. An evaluative study of the integrated smoking cessation services of Tung Wah Group of Hospitals. Published by Tung Wah Group of Hospitals in 2012. ISBN 978-962-8039-86-9.
  15. Wong CH, Ho KS, et al. Observational study on the efficacy of various modalities of Nicotine Replacement Therapy available in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Practitioner 2014;36:4-10.
  16. Leung DYP, Chan SSC, Lau CP, et al. An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Smoking Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ-12) among Chinese cardiac patients who smoke. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(8): 1311-1318.
  17. Gwaltney CJ, Metrik J, Kahler CW, et al. Self-efficacy and smoking cessation: a meta-analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2009;23(1):56-66.
  18. Cropsey KL, Weaver MF, Eldridge GD, et al. Differential success rates in racial groups: results of a clinical trial of smoking cessation among female prisoners. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(6):690-697.
  19. Trinidad DR, Pérez-Stable EJ, White MM, et al. A nationwide analysis of US racial/ethnic disparities in smoking behaviors, smoking cessation, and cessation-related factors. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(4):699-706.
  20. Li et al. Smoking among Hong Kong Chinese Women; behaviour, attitudes, and experience. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:183.
  21. Graham H, Der G. Patterns and predictors of smoking cessation among British women. Health Promot. Int. 1999;14 (3):231-240.
  22. Borrelli B, Hogan JW, Bock B, et al. Predictors of quitting and dropout among women in a clinic-based smoking cessation program. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2002;16(1):22-27.
  23. Shiffman S, Gnys M, Richards TJ, et al. Temptations to smoke after quitting: A Comparison of lapses and maintenance. Health Psycholo. 1996;15:455-461.
  24. Cepeda-Benito A, Reynoso JT, Erath S. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: differences between men and women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(4):712-722.
  25. Bohadana A, Nilsson F, Rasmussen T, et al. Gender differences in quit rates following smoking cessation with combination nicotine therapy: influence of baseline smoking behavior. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003;5(1):111-116.
  26. GF Swan, Denk CE, Rosenman RH, et al. Risk factors for late relapse in male and female. Addictive Behaviours. 1988;13:256-266.
  27. Cohen S, Lichentenstein E, Prochaska JO, et al. Debunking myths about self-quitting: evidence from 10 prospective studies of persons who attempt to quit smoking by themselves. Am Psychol. 1989:44;1355-1365.
  28. Murray RP, Johnston JJ, Dolce JJ, et al. Social support for smoking cessation and abstinence: the Lung Health Study. Addictive Behaviors. 1995;20:159-170.
  29. Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, et al. The validity of self- reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(7):1086-1093.
  30. Young JM, Ward JE. Influence of physician and patient gender on provision of smoking cessation advice in general practice. Tob Control. 1998;7(4):360-363.
  31. Pullon S, Webster M, McLeod D, et al. Smoking cessation and nicotine replacement therapy in current primary maternity care. Aust Fam Physician. 2004;33:94-96.
  32. Bijl RV, Ravelli A, van Zessen G. Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population:results of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998;33:587-595.
  33. Torchalla I, Bottorff JL, et al. Smoking cessation programs targeted to women: a system review. Women and Health. 2012;52:32-54.
  34. Oh ID, Heck EJ, et al. Determinants of smoking initiation among women in five European countries: a cross sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2010;10: 74-85.