A review on the management and
pharmacological treatments of benign
prostatic hyperplasia in primary care
Kai-Lim Chow 周啟廉,Pang-Fai Chan 陳鵬飛,David VK Chao 周偉強
HK Pract 2017;39:116-125
Summary
In men, the most common cause of lower urinary tract
symptoms (LUTS) is benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Bothersome LUTS can occur in up to 30% of men
older than 65 years. LUTS can considerably reduce
the quality of life of men and may indicate serious
pathology of the urogenital tract. Family physicians
should be able to differentiate different causes of
LUTS in men and provide appropriate treatment and
refer to urologists when indicated. The standard
pharmacological therapy for BPH is using an alphablocker.
Many patients may remain stable after being
prescribed with alpha-blockers. Surgical intervention
is an alternative treatment for patients who failed
pharmacological therapy or have other BPH-related
complications.
摘要
良性前列腺增生(BPH)是男性下尿路症狀(LUTS)最常見的原因。高達百分之三十的六十五歲以上男性患有使人困擾的LUTS。LUTS不但大大降低男性的生活質量,並且可能提示生殖泌尿道有嚴重的疾病。家庭醫生應該能夠鑒別診斷引發LUTS的各種不同原因,提供適當的治療,需要時將病人轉介給泌尿科醫生。BPH的標準藥物治療方案是使用α-阻滯劑。許多患者在服用α-阻滯劑後可以症狀保持穩定 。如果藥物治療無效或有其他BPH相關併發症,手術治療則是患者的另一種選擇。
Introduction
BPH is a histologic diagnosis that refers to the
proliferation of smooth muscle and epithelial cells
within the prostatic transition zone. The term ‘benign
prostatic enlargement’ is more correctly used to describe
prostatic enlargement.1 However, in common practice,
the terms are used interchangeably. Possible causes of
LUTS include abnormalities or abnormal function of the
prostate, urethra, urinary bladder and sphincters. Urinary
tract infection (UTI) and other medical causes can
also present as LUTS.2 Table 1 shows the differential
diagnoses of LUTS. In men, the most common cause of
LUTS is BPH. The prevalence of BPH increases with
age (~20% in 40-years-old men and 90% in 70-yearsold
men).3
Diagnosis
History
LUTS include voiding symptoms (weak or
intermittent urinary stream, straining, hesitancy, terminal
dribbling, and incomplete emptying), storage or irritative
symptoms (urgency, frequency, urgency incontinence,
and nocturia) and post-micturition symptoms (terminal
dribbling). Patients with BPH usually have voiding,
storage and post-micturition symptoms while patients
with overactivity of bladder usually present with mainly
storage symptoms.4 Symptoms severity of BPH can
be assessed by International Prostate Symptoms Score
(IPSS). It is a validated method for assessment of symptoms and quality of life in patients with BPH.2,5 A
medical history is necessary to identify or to rule out
those medical diseases that may also cause LUTS. For
example, diabetes can cause polyuria which may be
presented as urinary frequency; heart failure and sleep
apnoea can cause nocturia, Parkinson’s disease and
diabetes can cause LUTS due to autonomic neuropathy.
In addition, review of current medications including
over-the-counter and herbal medications is important.6
Table 2 shows the medications which may worsen
LUTS or cause urinary retention. Past medical history
like urological procedure which may increase the risk of
urethral stricture and family history of prostate cancer
are also important. Lifestyle habits, emotional and
psychological factors should be reviewed.7
Physical Examination
Physical examination of suprapubic area, external
genitalia ,perineum and lower limbs should be
performed. Urethral discharge, meatal stenosis, phimosis
and penile cancer must be excluded.2 Digital rectal examination (DRE) should be performed to evaluate
the anal sphincter tone, the size, consistency, shape
of the prostate gland and to detect any abnormalities
suggestive of prostate cancer. Although DRE is the
simplest way to assess prostate volume, the correlation
to prostate volume is poor.8
Investigation
Urinalysis
Urinalysis is recommended in most guidelines
in the management of patients with LUTS to identify
important conditions, such as UTI, microscopic
haematuria and diabetes mellitus.1,2,4,9,10
Renal function tests
Renal function may be assessed by serum creatinine
or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). One
study reported that 11% of men with LUTS had renal
insufficiency.11 Renal function tests should be offered
to patients with LUTS if patients are suspected of
renal impairment (for example, the man has a palpable
bladder, nocturnal enuresis, recurrent UTI or a history
of renal stones).4
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
According to the National Institute for Health
and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline 2010, LUTS
information, advice and time for decision should be
offered to patients with LUTS suggestive of bladder
outlet obstruction secondary to BPH or with abnormal
findings on DRE or with concern about prostate cancer
if they wish to have PSA testing.4 The American
Urological Association (AUA) recommends that PSA
should be measured in men who have at least a 10-year
life expectancy and who would be a candidate for
prostate cancer treatment.1
Post-void residual urine
Post-void residual (PVR) urine can be assessed
by transabdominal ultrasound. This is important for
the treatment of patients using muscarinic receptor
antagonist. It was recommended that measurement of
PVR in male LUTS should be a routine part of the
assessment.2
Uroflowmetry
Urinary flow rate assessment is a widely used
non-invasive urodynamic test. It was recommended
that uroflowmetry may be performed in the initial
assessment of male LUTS and should be performed
prior to any treatment.2
Management
Conservative management
According to the AUA standard, watchful waiting
is recommended for patients with mild symptoms
(IPSS score < 8).1 In one study, approximately 85% of
men with mild LUTS were stable on watchful waiting
at one year.12 Symptom distress may be reduced with
some behavioural and dietary modifications such as
reduction of fluid intake in evening, avoidance of intake
of caffeine or alcohol, use of relaxed, double-voiding
techniques and bladder retraining.13,14,15,16 Support from
a urology nurse may be beneficial. Regular monitoring
with history, physical examination and the IPSS
score can assess the treatment response and changing
symptoms. Increasing symptoms or bothersome scores
are reasonable indications to consider pharmacological
therapy.17
Pharmacological treatments
Alpha-blocker
According to the AUA standard, alpha-blockers
are appropriate and effective treatment alternatives for
patients with bothersome, moderate to severe LUTS
secondary to BPH (IPSS score ≥ 8).1 Alpha-blockers
aim to inhibit the effect of endogenously released
noradrenaline on smooth muscle cells in the prostate and
therefore reduce prostate tone.18 A study demonstrated
that both selective alpha-blockers (Alfuzosin and
Tamsulosin) and non-selective alpha-blockers (Doxazosin, Terazosin and Prazosin) have similar
efficacy.19 Selective alpha-blockers may have fewer
systemic side effects and are indicated in patients who
cannot tolerate non-selective alpha-blockers. The most
frequent adverse events of alpha-blockers are dizziness
and orthostatic hypotension. Vasodilating effects are
more pronounced with Doxazosin and Terazosin, and
are less common for Alfuzosin and Tamsulosin.20
Therapy with non-selective alpha-blockers should be
initiated with a low dose and then be titrated upward.
Side effects, particularly orthostatic hypotension, should
be explained to patients and patients’ blood pressure
should be monitored. Other potential adverse effects
of alpha-blockers include drowsiness, hypotension,
syncope, asthenia, depression, headache, dry mouth,
gastro-intestinal disturbances, edema, blurred vision,
intra-operative floppy iris syndrome (especially with
Tamsulosin), rhinitis, erectile disorders (including
priapism), tachycardia, palpitations, hypersensitivity
reactions including rash, pruritus and angioedema.21 Due
to the potential adverse effect of intra-operative floppy
iris syndrome and a lot of patients with BPH may have
co-existing cataract, the AUA guideline recommended
that patients should be asked about planned cataract
surgery when alpha-blocker therapy is offered. Patients
with planned cataract surgery are recommended to
avoid the initiation of alpha-blockers until their cataract
surgery is completed. However, for patients already
taking an alpha-blocker for treatment of BPH, there is
insufficient research evidence to recommend withholding
or discontinuing alpha blockers to mitigate the risk.
Table 4 shows the common dosage of alpha-blockers.
Muscarinic receptor antagonists
Muscarinic receptor antagonists block the
neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the central and the
peripheral nervous system. This class of medication
reduces the effects mediated by acetylcholine on its
receptors in bladder neurons through competitive
inhibition. There are five muscarinic subclasses (M1
through M5) of cholinergic receptors in the human
bladder muscle, the majority are subtypes M2 and
M3. While M2 receptors predominate, M3 receptors
are primarily responsible for bladder contraction.22
According to the AUA standard, muscarinic receptor
antagonists are appropriate and effective treatment
alternatives for the management of LUTS secondary
to BPH in men without an elevated PVR and when
LUTS are predominantly irritative.1 Also according to the European Association of Urology, combination
treatment of an alpha-blocker with a muscarinic
receptor antagonist is recommended in patients
with moderate-to-severe LUTS if relief of storage
symptoms has been insufficient with monotherapy
with either drug.2 Theoretically muscarinic receptor
antagonists might decrease bladder strength, and
hence might be associated with PVR urinary
retention. AUA suggested that baseline PVR
urine should be assessed prior to the initiation of
muscarinic receptor antagonists and these agents
should be used with caution in patients with a PVR
greater than 250 to 300 mL.1 There is no clear
evidence that one muscarinic receptor antagonist is better than another.23,24,25,26 However they may have
different anticholinergic side effects (See Table 3).21
Examples of muscarinic receptor antagonists include
Oxybutynin, Solifenacin, Tolterodine and Flavoxate.
Table 4 shows the common dosage of muscarinic
receptor antagonists. The potential adverse effects
are dry mouth, gastrointestinal disturbances, taste
disturbances, blurred vision, dry eyes, drowsiness,
dizziness, fatigue, difficulty in micturition, urinary
retention, palpitation, skin reactions, headache,
diarrhoea, angioedema, arrhythmias, tachycardia,
restlessness, disorientation, hallucination, convulsion,
reduce sweating leading to heat sensations and risk of
precipitating angle-closure glaucoma.21
5-alpha reductase inhibitors
5-alpha reductase inhibitors increase intracellular
cyclic guanosine monophosphate, thus reducing smooth
muscle tone of the detrusor, prostate and urethra.
They might also alter the reflex pathways in the spinal
cord and neurotransmission in the urethra, prostate, or
bladder.27 Chronic treatment seems to increase blood
perfusion and oxygenation in the lower urinary tract.28 It could reduce chronic inflammation in the prostate
and bladder.29 Moverover, it leads to a reduction in
the overall androgenic growth stimulus in the prostate,
an increase in apoptosis and atrophy and ultimately a
shrinkage of the organ.1 There are two 5-alpha reductase
inhibitors available namely Finasteride and Dutasteride.
No data directly compare these two inhibitors for their
differences in clinical efficacy. AUA guidelines stated that
5-alpha reductase inhibitors are appropriate and effective
treatment alternatives for men with LUTS secondary
to BPH who have demonstrable prostate enlargement.
Also European Association of Urology recommended
combination treatment with an alpha-blocker and a
5α-reductase inhibitor in men with moderate-to-severe
LUTS and risk of disease progression. In different
studies, various thresholds have been proposed for the
definition of prostate enlargement (25, 30 or 40 mL).
Serum PSA has been recommended as a proxy for
prostate size larger than 40 mL.2 A study suggested that
the approximate age-specific criteria for detecting men
with prostate glands exceeding 40 mL are PSA > 1.6 ng/
mL, > 2.0 ng/mL, and > 2.3 ng/mL for men with BPH in
their 50s, 60s, and 70s, respectively.30 5-alpha reductase
inhibitors can be used to prevent progression of LUTS
secondary to BPH and to reduce the risk of urinary
retention and future prostate-related surgery.1 Adverse
effects include decreased in libido, ejaculatory and
erectile dysfunction, breast tenderness and enlargement.21
Two trials have found a higher incidence of high-grade
prostatic cancers in patients receiving 5-alpha reductase
inhibitors.31,32 Although no causal relationship with highgrade
prostatic cancers has been proven, patients taking
5-alpha reductase inhibitors should have serial PSA
testing.2 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors typically decrease
a patient's PSA by about 50%.33 Because of delayed
prostatic response to 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, after
3 to 6 months of therapy, the tested PSA level should be
doubled in order to appropriately assess the patient's true
level.34 Table 4 shows the common dosage of 5-alpha
reductase inhibitors.
Follow-up
According to NICE guideline, patients should be
reviewed to assess symptoms, the effect of the drugs on
the patient's quality of life and to ask about any adverse
effects from treatment. For men prescribed with alphablockers
or muscarinic receptor antagonists, reviews
should be done more frequently for dosage titration
until symptoms are stable.4
Referral
Once treatment for BPH has been initiated, a
referral to a urologist would be indicated if there is
failure of urinary symptom control despite optimisation
of pharmacological therapy, suspicion of prostate cancer
from a prostate exam, elevation in serum PSA levels,
gross or persistent microscopic hematuria, sterile pyuria,
recurrent UTI, urinary calculus, hydronephrosis, meatus
stenosis, urinary retention and renal insufficiency or
renal failure due to obstruction.35
Conclusion
BPH is common in men and their incidence
increases with age. With an aging population, it
is important for family physicians to have a good
understanding of the non-operative management of BPH.
Pharmacological therapy can be initiated in the primary
care setting and many patients may remain stable
without the need for further treatment. The standard
therapy for managing a patient with BPH is initiating an
alpha-blocker. Muscarinic receptor antagonists may be
useful in patients with BPH and significant irritative or
storage symptoms despite the use of alpha-blockers. For
patients with larger prostates, the addition of a 5-alpha
reductase inhibitor may be considered. Patients should
be referred for urologist assessment if indicated.
Kai-Lim Chow,MSc (Epidemiology and Biostatistics) (CUHK), FHKAM (Family Medicine), FHKCFP,
FRACGP
Associate Consultant
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Kowloon East Cluster,
Hospital Authority
Pang-Fai Chan,MOM (CUHK), FHKAM (Family Medicine), FRACGP, FHKCFP
Consultant
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Kowloon East Cluster,
Hospital Authority
David VK Chao,MBChB (Liverpool), FRCGP, MFM (Monash), FHKAM (Family Medicine)
Chief of Service and Consultant
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, United Christian Hospital and
Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Kowloon East Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR
Correspondence to: Dr Kai-Lim Chow, Department of Family Medicine and Primary
Health Care, United Christian Hospital, 130 Hip Wo Street,
Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.
E-mail: chowkl2@ha.org.hk
References
- Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). American Urological
Association guidelines 2010.
- Management of Non-Neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
(LUTS), incl. Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO). European Association of
Urology Guideline 2016.
- McVary K: BPH: Epidemiology and Comorbidities. Am J Manag Care 12
2006; 5 Suppl: S122.
- Lower urinary tract symptoms – The management of lower urinary tract
symptoms in men. NICE guideline 97. May 2010.
- PS Szeto. Application of the Chinese version of the International Prostate
Symptom Score for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms in a
primary health care setting. Hong Kong Med J 2008;14:458-464.
- Melanie C. Wuerstle et al. Contribution of Common Medications to Lower
Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Oct 10; 171(18):
1680-1682.
- Jonathan L. Diagnosis and Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
American Family Physician 2008 May 15;77(10):1403-1410.
- Weissfeld, J.L., et al. Quality control of cancer screening examination
procedures in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer
Screening Trial. Control Clin Trials, 2000;21:390s.
- Roehrborn, C.G., et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of benign
prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative, international overview. Urology,
2001;58: 642.
- Abrams, P., et al. Evaluation and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms
in older men. J Urol, 2013;189:S93.
- Gerber, G.S., et al. Serum creatinine measurements in men with lower
urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology,
1997;49:697.
- Netto, N.R., Jr., et al. Evaluation of patients with bladder outlet obstruction
and mild international prostate symptom score followed up by watchful
waiting. Urology, 1999;53:314.
- Isaacs, J.T. Importance of the natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia
in the evaluation of pharmacologic intervention. Prostate Suppl, 1990;3:1.
- Netto, N.R., Jr., et al. Evaluation of patients with bladder outlet obstruction
and mild international prostate symptom score followed up by watchful
waiting. Urology, 1999;53:314.
- Brown, C.T., et al. Self management for men with lower urinary tract
symptoms: randomized controlled trial. Bmj, 2007;334:25.
- Yap, T.L., et al. The impact of self-management of lower urinary tract
symptoms on frequency volume chart measures. BJU Int, 2009;104:1104.
- M Arianayagam. Lower urinary tract symptoms – current management in
older men. Australian Family Physician 2011;758-767.
- Michel, M.C., et al. Alpha1-, alpha2- and beta-adrenoceptors in the urinary
bladder, urethra and prostate. Br J Pharmacol, 2006;147 Suppl 2: S88.
- Djavan, B., et al. State of the art on the efficacy and tolerability of alpha1-
adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms
suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology, 2004. 64: 1081
- Nickel, J.C., et al. A meta-analysis of the vascular-related safety profile
and efficacy of alpha adrenergic blockers for symptoms related to benign
prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Clin Pract, 2008;62: 1547.
- British National Formulary March 2015
- Caulfield M, Birdsall N: International Union of Pharmacology. XVII.
Classification of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Pharmacol Rev
1998;50:279.
- Herschorn, S., et al. Efficacy and tolerability of fesoterodine in men with
overactive bladder: a pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies. Urology,
2010;75: 1149.
- Kaplan, S.A., et al. Tolterodine extended release improves overactive bladder
symptoms in men with overactive bladder and nocturia. Urology, 2006;68:
328.
- Kaplan, S.A., et al. Tolterodine and tamsulosin for treatment of men
with lower urinary tract symptoms and overactive bladder: a randomized
controlled trial. Jama, 2006;296: 2319.
- Roehrborn, C.G., et al. Efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine extendedrelease
in men with overactive bladder and urgency urinary incontinence.
BJU Int, 2006;97: 1003.
- Giuliano, F., et al. The mechanism of action of phosphodiesterase type 5
inhibitors in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign
prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol, 2013;63:506.
- Morelli, A., et al. Phosphodiesterase type 5 expression in human and rat
lower urinary tract tissues and the effect of tadalafil on prostate gland
oxygenation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Sex Med, 2011;8:2746.
- Vignozzi, L., et al. PDE5 inhibitors blunt inflammation in human BPH:
a potential mechanism of action for PDE5 inhibitors in LUTS. Prostate,
2013;73:1391.
- Roehrborn, C.G., et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of
prostate volume in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology, 1999.
53:581.
- Andriole, G.L., et al. Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. N
Engl J Med, 2010;362:1192.
- Thompson, I.M., et al. The influence of finasteride on the development of
prostate cancer. N Engl J Med, 2003;349:215.
- Burnett AL, Wein AJ. Benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care: what
you need to know. J Urol. 2006;175:S19-S24.
- McVary KT. BPH: epidemiology and comorbidities. Am J Manag Care.
2006;12(suppl 5):S122-S128.
- Kapoor A. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) management in the primary
care setting. Can J Urol 2012;19(Suppl 1):10-17.
|