Family medicine, cross road -
where are we?
Stephen KS Foo 傅鑑蘇
HK Pract 2021;43:1-2
The Hong Kong College of Family Physicians has been in existence
for 44 years with the objectives of training qualified family doctors as the
cornerstone in primary care to provide primary, continuous, comprehensive
and whole person care to the community. The establishment of the Conjoint
Fellowship Examination with the Royal Australian College of General
Practitioners in the past 34 years has enabled Fellows to provide a high
standard of family medicine care to citizens. The fact the Hong Kong College
of Family Physicians was incorporated as one of the constituent foundation
Colleges of the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine in 1992 has reinforced the
Specialist status of the Academy Fellows of our College.
We have as up to the time of writing a total of 805 Fellows of the
College, of whom, 521 are specialists in family medicine. The majority
of them are working in the public sector taking care of about 30 % of the
population of Hong Kong. Most of the primary care doctors in private do not
possess higher qualifications in family medicine and they are taking up the
major roles of providing 70% of primary care in our community.
Having served the local community in private capacity in primary care
over the past 50 years, sometimes I wonder, is the standard of primary care
improving commensurable with the growth of the College and the increase
in number of our College Fellows. Personal experience tells me that it is not.
There is great improvement in service provided by the public sector as these
clinics are training grounds and our trainees are required to go through the
training programs designed by the College. Most trainees are employed by
the Hospital Authority to serve in the Outpatient Departments after training.
Of course, there is a lot to improve in provision of standard care to the
community in the public sector but most of the defects are in the system
of delivery of primary care by the health authority. On the other hand, I
cannot see much improvement in care provided by primary care doctors
in private sector. Many practicing in private sector, especially those with
postgraduate training in family medicine, are doing very well, exhibiting care, concern and empathy towards with good skills in
problem solving for their patients. Still quite a number
of primary care doctors in private have not demonstrated
the standard of care required of in the practice of family
medicine. Hence a lot of frustrations, dissatisfaction,
complaints and even lawsuits occur in the doctor-patient
consultations. They may not be providing the adequate
primary care including whole person, comprehensive and
anticipatory care to our patients, resulting in enhancing
the morbidity of our patients and increasing demand
in hospital admissions. Sometimes I wonder why the
delivery of primary health care in the community is
so heterogenous despite our effort invested in training
family doctors. Most of the college fellows after training
work in the government sector. However, the majority of
service is provided by doctors in private sector. I wonder
what is the quality control of these doctors as service
providers. Doctors after acquiring the basic qualifications
should be able to deliver a reasonable standard of service
to the patients. With the fast escalation of medical
knowledge in medicine and the rapid advances in medical
technologies, we should not be complacent with what
we have learned in the medical schools. We owe our
patients a disfavor if we are not doing the best for our
patients. There is no regulation that primary doctors who
are not specialists should be equipped with continuing
medical education, continuous professional development
activities, training or any post graduate qualifications to
serve the primary care. The College is tasked with the
responsibility to ensure a standard of care to our patients
through education, training and assessment in family
medicine. The execution as to how our community is well protected to be entitled a reasonable primary care is
to be decided by the health authority
Unless there is a balanced cooperation between the
health authority and the College to see how the health
of our people can be enhanced, through a better medical
service provided by the primary doctors in Hong Kong,
there is not much point in continuing the College’s
efforts in producing more qualified family doctors.
The College has done her part. It is up to the
health authority to consider how to regulate and upgrade
the standard of primary care medical service to the
community. Apart from the provision of the Fellowship
Examination to members, the College has provided
different courses of training in family medicine to
all doctors in Hong Kong, like the one year course
of Diploma in Family Medicine which is a quotable
qualification by the Hong Kong Medical Council. I
think some guidelines should be imposed by the Medical
Council to the fresh graduates who would like to enter
into primary care service in Hong Kong.
Passing the basic undergraduate medical examination
is only the first step in the medical career. We need more
than a basic medical degree to better serve our people.
Life long learning and acquisition of postgraduate
training is a must in the delivery of a satisfactory service
in primary health care.
I strongly urge the health authority to seriously
consider why the primary health care standard in the
community is not proceeding with time.
Stephen KS Foo,
FHKAM (Family Medicine), FHKCFP (Hon), FRACGP (Hon), FAFPM (Hon)
Specialist in Family Medicine in Private Practice;
Censor and Past President,
The Hong Kong College of Family Physicians
Correspondence to:
Dr Stephen KS Foo, G/F, 9 Tak Ku Ling Road,
Kowloon City, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.
E-mail: stephenksfoo@gmail.com
|